Sentiment vote : Proposal for a compensation in ACA from Acala treasury to Starlay exploit victims

Please find the whole proposal here : https://acala.discourse.group/t/proposal-for-governance-vote-about-a-compensation-from-acala-treasury-to-starlay-exploit-victims/2300?u=ipchess
I understand that we may end up in a situation where option 4 gets more votes individually, but where the sum of the votes in favor of options 1, 2 and 3 is superior to the number of votes in favor of option 4. However, since this is only an off-chain sentiment vote, I do not believe it is an issue. Voters can vote according to their own belief, independently of which option is going to get the maximum number of votes. The main objectives of this vote are to check:
1/ Whether a majority is in favor of a compensation in ACA from the treasury or not. To that purpose, the sum of votes in favor of options 1, 2 and 3 should be compared to the votes in favor of option 4 alone,
2/ Which option among 1, 2 and 3 is prefered by voters, in case there is a compensation.
Thank you in advance for your votes

25Kd...jGBY

25Kdyeh8XTyh8gFWvVHZq2K9ihZKLuzJxAuLfCNEFzswjGBY

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 6 months.

# 1

≈ 1.22M ACA

23vC...ZU6C

23vCX9QLo2wVFPz64oJQ3sUdJBQJeWkBPnSPzyw2c1HpZU6C

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 6 months.

# 1

≈ 343.45 ACA

26am...RYQY

26ami3z5ut4nV2UXxnumgEySp44ypHD6AP6eAcHcsRGZRYQY

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 6 months.

# 1

≈ 2.46K ACA

25xa...F6Em

25xawYE7NkvRBL7gragUrGq8jXQHigxS5zW8MVgnyHoyF6Em

Acala should provide no compensation at all in ACA to affected users

# 4

≈ 75.76K ACA

26Jm...gT2k

26JmEcghNmggvT46sojckg34Py9zFRKkCcFy3gr49hrFgT2k

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 6 months.

# 1

≈ 188.12K ACA

I don't know in detail how the Acala team is managed, but if they can assume points 1,2 or 3 it would be a great gesture of their good faith

224n...cu7i

224ndszjH9PaxrhVJepTJefgwEwXBAGpMUjPk2HtjzPocu7i

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 6 months.

# 1

≈ 11.99K ACA

22Lc...7Xq2

22Lc9Sni2tWKPBbzEF5GWkfFdYTM3QjbqWtdKuYUyCGg7Xq2

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 6 months.

# 1

≈ 5.86K ACA

21L4...42U1

21L4Te9376s4UMi5s1QzepahaaBcw3YzMVQJbdsGEec742U1

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 6 months.

# 1

≈ 594.68 ACA

224m...mzZ4

224m53pN8g3iSVdCLre8Uanwqpvs2LEyGjc9sgvcHQJSmzZ4

Acala would distribute 400k$ in ACA immediately after vote

# 3

≈ 714.69 ACA

23Tn...Mcv6

23Tnfdgszk34u4KjY8J22Hg6NpWmworN3N9TFV5QdRpGMcv6

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 1 year.

# 2

≈ 35.48K ACA

I vote for this option because it is the best tradeoff between : i) a decent compensation to affected users to keep them loyal and ii) a proof of goodwill from affected users that we are here for the long term and do not care about having many of these tokens vested on a long period

26Ap...GXcQ

26ApJbS6TYYQfMPCQ53BdABbK6G344zuskkqfSPCmbUgGXcQ

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 6 months.

# 1

≈ 1.05K ACA

234L...nLGe

234L3fy2UwFencQttsvDMRKjjdf7TdQYPXg7H6inRp5KnLGe

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 6 months.

# 1

≈ 288.93K ACA

23ZB...3P5R

23ZBVkebHzZSh5okoExSq1iQwANmDzGRtb2h7gRK6vR93P5R

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 6 months.

# 1

≈ 36.02K ACA

21Ua...R5b7

21UaZ3WYDNyjYD6YRoX2FdwWd7KxhPf36bhWaiYbvxgDR5b7

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 6 months.

# 1

≈ 9.25K ACA

25BC...kqU3

25BCkpy7GXw8HMusshSmwSjNBVQ2Hd1zeUiixbFnGoNjkqU3

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 6 months.

# 1

≈ 5.37 ACA

22c1...RWtn

22c1qyYWQS94JSSpYFFcYSs8hYynuwS99pCwUcDayTD1RWtn

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 6 months.

# 1

≈ 193.25K ACA

22Yq...Kc3P

22YqbL6EuUVPjHTNSkfRimWTCn6CpZwThgH4KqMZ7XmKKc3P

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 6 months.

# 1

≈ 153.72 ACA

24gH...neKG

24gHTxjnD2ghPzWbKnMFoRLh8MwARtLzQ6VWHw2SPy7jneKG

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 6 months.

# 1

≈ 3.59K ACA

23Nu...jegs

23NujvuWQysyspuf5NrV6LFj8aJHhFJXouc95DcnW7vNjegs

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 6 months.

# 1

≈ 597.28 ACA

24BY...Bcs7

24BYdx14Rooo7sG2RfgLwKEbvitbKYBZBtXAYnKbrTe1Bcs7

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 6 months.

# 1

≈ 153.29 ACA

24sG...7cKY

24sGPDUGQpj8w79N37neGFDTv2PTer9VdtSmFreRfdoQ7cKY

Acala would distribute 250k$ in ACA immediately after vote + 200k$ in ACA vesting linearly on 6 months.

# 1

≈ 0.2 ACA

Votes·21

Discussions·2