[MS] DOT #1634 - Politecnico di Milano, Blockchain & Web3 Observatory 2025 Partnership
Terminated 
terminated
Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1634

  • A partnership is proposed with Politecnico di Milano’s Blockchain & Web3 Observatory for 2025.
  • The Politecnico is a top-ranked university in Italy for Engineering and Technology.
  • The Observatory helps businesses, researchers, and policymakers work together on blockchain.
  • The partnership aims to help Polkadot grow in Europe by working with regulators, businesses, and developers.
  • Benefits include research, workshops, and visibility for Polkadot.
  • The total cost is around $59,240, managed by the Polkadot Community Foundation.
  • Polkadot Italia, a team of four, will coordinate the partnership.
  • They focus on growing Polkadot’s presence in Italy through events and education.
Appendants
1
#1
1mo ago

🟢 5 • 🔴 2 • ⚪️ 2
Vote #1: AYE
10 available members.
No CoI reported. DV delegation exercised.
https://polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic/26770674-2
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1634#9

Optionssingle

Votes·10

12Hi...E9N3
12Hi...E9N3
12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3
Aye
Aye
PoliMi is an excellent university and being able to have Polkadot in an institutional event hosted there is worthwhile to fund.
167Y...TY9F
167Y...TY9F
167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F
Aye
Aye
This could be spearheaded into other regions! lets get into the Medialab @MIT!
14gM...deVb
14gM...deVb
14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb
Abstain
Abstain

Switched to abstain because I can't evaluate the possible impact. Though I'm not confident about the spend to PCF, I won't give a nay.

1xzc...1bX6
1xzc...1bX6
1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6
Aye
Aye
We believe this is a worthwhile experiment to try. We think this could be a different strategy than simply educating people about blockchain at Universities.
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w
Aye
Aye
Interested to look at this as an experiment and gauge the return to Polkadot.
12Kt...DCoJ
12Kt...DCoJ
12KtA8mtfsK1CyQb4utLiwG3ao22z77w2cM2GqnaL2RiDCoJ
Nay
Nay
this feels like a high-cost slice of a larger request that may require more funding down the line. it's hard to justify nearly $20k just for coordination efforts, or the need for PCF to be involved when the marketing bounty could be used. if a legal entity is truly required, it may be better to explore other events/avenues for growth as $12k for a signature seems hard to defend when those funds could drive far broader reach through programmatic/social campaigns or other channels.
12s6...nE8h
12s6...nE8h
12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h
Abstain
Abstain
Looks reasonable to us, but we can see how some might want more details on expected outcomes before fully supporting or rejecting the proposal. Plus, isn't this a subject for MB instead?
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh
Abstain
Abstain
I believe that the team that is driving the proposal is a good team to achieve objectives, however, I am not entirely sure that we can achieve great results from this alliance. I remain in abstain.
15fT...yBzL
15fT...yBzL
15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL
Aye
Aye
I find the budget reasonable for the experiment offered. I would be happy if the team documented the experience and the process really well, so it can set an example to future teams seeking such partnerships. It would also set a good example for regional DAOs if Polkadot Italia executes this proposal successfully. I'm looking forward to the results.
13ED...KQbF
13ED...KQbF
13EDmaUe89xXocPppFmuoAZaCsckaJy3deAyVyiykk1zKQbF
Aye
Aye

This is worth the cost to try something that targets a broader group of techies.

Discussions·5

Hello guys, i'd like to answer to Yongfeng:

7. Why is a separate funding request being made, if the Polkadot Community Foundation already receives treasury support for legal operations?

It is true that the Polkadot Community Foundation (PCF) is receiving treasury funding through a separate, dedicated proposal. However, those funds are allocated to cover the structural legal and administrative setup of the foundation and do not include handling the operational details of specific initiatives, such as this partnership.

In particular, the PCF funding does not cover:

  • The operational management of individual initiatives
  • Banking transfer fees and financial handling
  • Documentation review and due diligence for each project
  • Any legal expenses specific to this partnership or similar activities

Hello @PolkaBiz_Voting, Hi Mario and Christian,
I completely understand your concerns about the potential impact of this proposal, I would likely share them if I were in your position. That’s exactly why I want to emphasize that, as you rightly pointed out, this is a pilot initiative.

The goal is to explore whether a closer and ongoing collaboration with one of Europe’s most prestigious universities could lead to something meaningful for both us and the Polkadot ecosystem.

Of course, if after a year we see that the initiative hasn’t delivered tangible results, I would be the first to suggest not renewing it. That said, considering the people involved and the kind of research the Politecnico di Milano is doing, we believe it’s worth giving this experiment a chance.

The requested amount is relatively modest and won’t strain the treasury. Moreover, the W3F will support every workshop and event, helping us closely monitor and evaluate the actual impact of this collaboration.

For these reasons, we’re asking the community to support this opportunity, not just to explore this path now, but potentially to extend it in the future and replicate it in other countries as well, with the support of the Politecnico di Milano, which holds a strong reputation among European universities.

@FlezSoHot
We initially approached both the Marketing Bounty and the Events Bounty, and in both cases we were advised to submit this request via OpenGov.

The PCF-related cost has been intentionally overestimated to avoid any potential payment blockers or delays any unspent funds will be returned to the treasury. This is a safeguard rather than an actual expected expense.

Regarding coordination: the effort and responsibility involved in managing a partnership of this scale through to Q1 2026 is significant. We believe the budget is justified, especially when compared with similar proposals in fact, we would argue that our ask is on the lower end of what’s typically requested for this level of commitment.

@EzioRed
Yesterday, as an exception, we were in Milan at a meeting organized by the guys from the Politecnico together with:

Alessandro Giovannini, European Central Bank (BCE)
Alexandra Soroko, Visa
Ares Wekwerth, AllUnity (stablecoin)

I don't know what other European initiative is trying to get in touch with the institutions, we at Polkadot Italia could do it. Furthermore, participation in the workshops is open to everyone based on their level of experience and domain of activity, as explained yesterday at the AAG.

All we need is the support of the community.

@Polkadotters
For more detailed information, I recommend reading my thread on X about it.
https://x.com/thewhiterabbitM/status/1941028148734304549

Information
Members
11
Timestamp
Created
Jun 26 2025 19:52
Start date
Jun 26 2025 00:00
End date
Aug 25 2025 00:00
Results
Voters
10
one-person-one-vote
Aye
6 VOTE
 
Nay
1 VOTE
 
Abstain
3 VOTE
 
© 2025 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.