[MS] DOT #1634 - Politecnico di Milano, Blockchain & Web3 Observatory 2025 Partnership
active
Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1634

  • A partnership is proposed with Politecnico di Milano’s Blockchain & Web3 Observatory for 2025.
  • The Politecnico is a top-ranked university in Italy for Engineering and Technology.
  • The Observatory helps businesses, researchers, and policymakers work together on blockchain.
  • The partnership aims to help Polkadot grow in Europe by working with regulators, businesses, and developers.
  • Benefits include research, workshops, and visibility for Polkadot.
  • The total cost is around $59,240, managed by the Polkadot Community Foundation.
  • Polkadot Italia, a team of four, will coordinate the partnership.
  • They focus on growing Polkadot’s presence in Italy through events and education.
Cast your votesingle

Votes·8

12Hi...E9N3
12Hi...E9N3
12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3
Aye
Aye
PoliMi is an excellent university and being able to have Polkadot in an institutional event hosted there is worthwhile to fund.
167Y...TY9F
167Y...TY9F
167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F
Aye
Aye
This could be spearheaded into other regions! lets get into the Medialab @MIT!
14gM...deVb
14gM...deVb
14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb
Nay
Nay
Not sure about the benefits for polkadot and can not understand why another fund to PCF.
1xzc...1bX6
1xzc...1bX6
1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6
Abstain
Abstain
We feel partial. On one side, this seems like a good experiment to try. On the other hand, we are uncertain about the impact of these university initiatives.
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w
Aye
Aye
Interested to look at this as an experiment and gauge the return to Polkadot.
12Kt...DCoJ
12Kt...DCoJ
12KtA8mtfsK1CyQb4utLiwG3ao22z77w2cM2GqnaL2RiDCoJ
Nay
Nay
this feels like a high-cost slice of a larger request that may require more funding down the line. it's hard to justify nearly $20k just for coordination efforts, or the need for PCF to be involved when the marketing bounty could be used. if a legal entity is truly required, it may be better to explore other events/avenues for growth as $12k for a signature seems hard to defend when those funds could drive far broader reach through programmatic/social campaigns or other channels.
12s6...nE8h
12s6...nE8h
12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h
Abstain
Abstain
Looks reasonable to us, but we can see how some might want more details on expected outcomes before fully supporting or rejecting the proposal. Plus, isn't this a subject for MB instead?
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh
Abstain
Abstain
I believe that the team that is driving the proposal is a good team to achieve objectives, however, I am not entirely sure that we can achieve great results from this alliance. I remain in abstain.

Discussions·5

No current comments
...
Information
Snapshot
Members
11
Timestamp
Created
Jun 26 2025 19:52
Start date
Jun 26 2025 00:00
End date
Aug 25 2025 00:00
Results
Voters
8
one-person-one-vote
Aye
3 VOTE
 
Nay
2 VOTE
 
Abstain
3 VOTE
 
© 2025 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.