[WFC] DOT #1827 - [Wish For Change] The Dynamic Allocation Pool (DAP) and the future of staking: Phase 1
[WFC] DOT #1827 - [Wish For Change] The Dynamic Allocation Pool (DAP) and the future of staking: Phase 1
active
Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1827

Here's a simple summary of the proposed changes to Polkadot:

  • Stop Burning DOT: The network will stop destroying DOT tokens from fees and other activities.
  • Save DOT in a New Pool: Instead of being burned, that DOT will be saved in a new account called the DAP.
  • Slash Money Goes to the Pool: DOT taken from misbehaving validators (slashes) will also go to the DAP pool.
  • Validators Need More Skin in the Game: Validators must lock up at least 10,000 DOT of their own and charge at least a 10% fee.
  • Protect Nominators: Regular stakers (nominators) will not lose their DOT if a validator they back misbehaves.
  • Faster Unbonding: Nominators can get their staked DOT back much faster, within 1-2 days.
  • Goal: These are the first steps to build a new system for managing DOT and prepare for future upgrades.
Appendants
1
#1
7h ago

Vote #1 submitted.
```
WISH FOR CHANGE

8 available members
🟢 3 • 🔴 0 • ⚪️ 1
✓ ≥50.0% required participation met
▶ Ayes ≥60.0% of all votes
🟢 AYE

No CoI reported. DV delegation exercised.
https://assethub-polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic/11154295-2
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1827#2
Cast your votesingle
Results
Voters
4
one-person-one-vote
Information
Members
9
Timestamp
Created
Dec 30 2025 15:28
Start date
Dec 30 2025 00:00
End date
Feb 28 2026 00:00

Votes·4

14gM...deVb
14gM...deVb
14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb
Aye
Aye

It looks right direction.

14Gn...YLEh
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh
Aye
Aye

Fast unbonding? AYE!

12Hi...E9N3
12Hi...E9N3
12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3
Abstain
Abstain

Fast unbounding has been a community request for a long time and DAP concept seems well aligned with the tokenomics proposal approved by the community.

However, I'd still like to cast this vote in protest: why are these not being done on Kusama first?

12s6...nE8h
12s6...nE8h
12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h
Aye
Aye

Those changes sound reasonable, especially the fast unbond for nominators. Some are more questionable, but overall, we are ok with it. Aye

Discussions·0

No current comment data
...
Information
Members
9
Timestamp
Created
Dec 30 2025 15:28
Start date
Dec 30 2025 00:00
End date
Feb 28 2026 00:00
Results
Voters
4
one-person-one-vote
© 2026 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.