[MS] DOT #1667 - Merkle Mountain Belt (MMB)
active
Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1667

  • A new data structure called Merkle Mountain Belt (MMB) is proposed.
  • MMB improves on existing structures like Merkle Mountain Range (MMR).
  • It helps reduce costs for bridges and other Polkadot applications.
  • A research paper and Rust library will be created.
  • Expected savings: around $1 million per year.
  • Work will be done from August 2025 to June 2026.
  • The team includes experienced Polkadot researchers and developers.
  • Changes from previous proposals include lower costs and simpler goals.
Appendants
2
#1
10d ago

🟢 0 • 🔴 1 • ⚪️ 6
6 members abstained, higher than the 5-member threshold.
Vote #1: ABSTAIN
10 available members.
No CoI reported. DV delegation exercised.
https://polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic/27022305-3
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1667#4

#2
25min ago

🟢 5 • 🔴 2 • ⚪️ 3
Vote #2: AYE
10 available members.
No CoI reported. DV delegation exercised.
https://polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic/27178079-3
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1667#12

Cast your votesingle

Votes·10

14gM...deVb
14gM...deVb
14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb
Nay
Nay

I hope this proposal can be first reviewed by the fellowship lead by Gav.

12s6...nE8h
12s6...nE8h
12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h
Abstain
Abstain
1xzc...1bX6
1xzc...1bX6
1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6
Aye
Aye

We like the new proposal.

15fT...yBzL
15fT...yBzL
15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL
Aye
Aye

Switching to aye following strong endorsement from the technical community.

167Y...TY9F
167Y...TY9F
167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F
Abstain
Abstain

Can change my vote if tech fellowship avails this.

14Gn...YLEh
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh
Abstain
Abstain

I am not entirely sure about the technical content of the proposal, so I prefer to abstain.

12Kt...DCoJ
12Kt...DCoJ
12KtA8mtfsK1CyQb4utLiwG3ao22z77w2cM2GqnaL2RiDCoJ
Aye
Aye

after considering community feedback, i'm switching from abstain to aye. cross-chain activity is gaining momentum, and this proposal seems like it could help support that growth. early usage via hydration and bifrost suggests it’s worth exploring.

1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w
Nay
Nay

I'd like to see this pursued via the fellowship or fellowship treasury

13ED...KQbF
13ED...KQbF
13EDmaUe89xXocPppFmuoAZaCsckaJy3deAyVyiykk1zKQbF
Aye
Aye

After reviewing this again, we still believe it could be funded elsewhere, but the advantages of this going through OpenGov at this very moment outweigh its disadvantages. The reduced cost in bridge fees and a faster go-to-market for JAM implementers makes this a sensible Aye.

12Hi...E9N3
12Hi...E9N3
12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3
Aye
Aye

With the strong show of support from both the technical fellowship as well as the W3F, my second vote is AYE.

Discussions·3

No current comments
...
Information
Members
11
Timestamp
Created
Jul 10 2025 14:23
Start date
Jul 10 2025 00:00
End date
Sep 08 2025 00:00
Results
Voters
10
one-person-one-vote
Aye
5 VOTE
 
Nay
2 VOTE
 
Abstain
3 VOTE
 
© 2025 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.