It's potentially a valuable scaling effort in the NFT domain, but unfortunately I cannot see it generating value for Polkadot at this point, especially under the current market conditions. One option for the proposers could be to submit a considerably smaller proposal for the first milestone, but even for that, I think they'll have to wait multiple months until the uncertainty in the ecosystem resolves into some clarity.

Not confident it can bring growth to polkadot.

We recognise the value of creating NFTs on Bitcoin using BRC-721. However, the number of new developers and users resulting from this integration is irrelevant in these conditions. Nay.

I agree with HELIKON's comments that Bitcoin native NFTs could offer a lot of potential for hundreds of use cases and paying for a well documented, open source SDK sounds pretty good imo.

I'd like to see this proposal again, hopefully sooner rather than later, with a lower ask hopefully.

I would also take any core time shenanigans out of the proposal if I'm being honest, it's very unlikely it would cause an uptick. I think with a milestone based payment structure and a slightly tuned budget could find support in OpenGov, rejecting this outright would be near sighted of the community imo.

I still do not see the positive impact this could have directly in Polkadot. I am voting NAY.