[INT] PDAO #0 - Delegation Mandate for Members
End in 5d
active
Description

This internal referendum proposes to make it mandatory for the members of Permanence DAO to delegate the DAO for at least the Decentralized Voices delegation tracks, which are all Spender tracks (32, 33, 34), Tipper tracks (30, 31), as well as the Treasurer track (11) and Wish-for-change track (2).

The current delegations from the members are as follows:

# Member Delegated (DOT) Conviction Total (DOT)
1 José Rabasso 7,500 6x 45,000
2 Helikon 7,500 6x 45,000
3 EzioRed 3,000 3x 9,000
4 Yongfeng 1,000 4x 4,000
5 PolkaBiz 150 6x 900
6 Polkadotters 100 4x 400
7 The Ionian Group 30 4x 120
8 16B1...oYFj 10 5x 50
TOTAL 104,470

Last account presumably belongs to William.

RATIONALE

The reasoning behind this proposal is straightforward: it is unreasonable to expect a delegator to delegate to the DAO when its core members are not doing so. A core member not delegating to the DAO displays a lack of conviction, especially given that the current non-delegating members are recipients of grants from the W3F, the treasury, or both.

PROPOSAL

1. Grace Period:
A grace period of one week from the date of the proposal's passing will be provided.

2. Compliance:
Members who fail to comply by the end of the grace period will be removed from the DAO.

3. Conviction Requirement:

  • A lower limit of 50 DOT total with a minimum conviction of 3x is proposed, in alignment with the current minimum among delegating members.

4. Ongoing Compliance:
The grace period will also apply to any member who removes their delegation, and the member gets removed at the end of the grace period should they fail to restore their delegation within the grace period.

Thank you for your time. Let’s preserve the integrity of our DAO.

Appendants
1
#1
1d ago

Additionally, the delegation should be made from an identity-verified account that belongs to the member, or a child account of an identity-verified account.

Cast your votesingle

Votes·7

15fT...yBzL
15fT...yBzL
15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL
Aye
# 1
1xzc...1bX6
1xzc...1bX6
1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6
Aye
# 1
We agree with the content of this proposal.
14gM...deVb
14gM...deVb
14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb
Aye
# 1
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh
Aye
# 1
13ED...KQbF
13ED...KQbF
13EDmaUe89xXocPppFmuoAZaCsckaJy3deAyVyiykk1zKQbF
Aye
# 1
12Hi...E9N3
12Hi...E9N3
12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3
Abstain
# 3
1433...pWXn
1433...pWXn
14333MZvbGkcq5CZ8fYHZiFYwHNDaW3uiErDKMb7oqnupWXn
Aye
# 1

Discussions·0

No current comments
Information
Snapshot
Timestamp
Created
Jan 16 2025 07:32
Start date
Jan 15 2025 21:00
End date
Jan 22 2025 21:00
Results
Voters
7
one-person-one-vote
Aye
6 VOTE
 
Nay
0 VOTE
 
Abstain
1 VOTE
 
© 2025 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.