[SS] DOT #1776 - Treasury Guardian v2

13zn...P5ju

End

active

Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1776

We updated our proposal based on community feedback
We lowered the budget from 83,600 to 60,800 USDC
We made our project goals clearer with four simple steps
Step 1: Build basic tool with reward system
Step 2: Add tracking for delayed payments
Step 3: Help more people use the tool
Step 4: Create leaderboard and connect with other tools
Guardians will watch payments to protect treasury funds
All payments happen after work is completed and approved

Cast your votesingle

Results

Voters

one-person-one-vote

Information

IPFS

#QmRyiMS

Members

Timestamp

Created

Oct 23 2025 08:44

Start date

Oct 23 2025 00:00

End date

Dec 22 2025 00:00

Votes·2

167Y...TY9F

167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F

Abstain

I appreciate the intent, but I have concerns.

This feels like a band‑aid that only addresses a small slice of our governance problems. It introduces reputation tracking and concentrates selection in the hands of a few individuals, which isn’t the best way to kick off a systemic change. Where is expertise accounted for? Will technical reviews be performed by domain experts or by generalist devs evaluating business cases?

I support improving OpenGov mechanics to raise the quality of funding decisions and reduce spend on non‑deliverables, but this approach as written doesn’t achieve that.

I can give you some of my time to talk it over. I'm abstaining because I'm working on a project for "opengov 2.0".

14Gn...YLEh

14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh

Nay

I am still in NAY.
i have the same position that I had in the V1.

Discussions·0

No current comment data

...