[MS] DOT #1564 - Funding Proposal: Bounty Hub

[MS] DOT #1564 - Funding Proposal: Bounty Hub

End

active

Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1564

Funding Proposal: Bounty Hub Milestone 1

Proponent: Galaniprojects GmbH
Address: 143A8aK5Sdiyw8eHMbGKRWz1VdKg75BG2SRVXTFwyHjuujCE
Date: 13/05/2025
Requested Funding: 98,905 USDC (89,040€, 1€ ≈ 1.11 USDC on 13/05/2025)
Short Description: Funding for the first development milestone of Bounty Hub, a backend for Bounty Manager, to allow multisig management and simplified log in features.
Website: Bounty Manager
Project Category/Type: Software Development
Detailed Proposal: Proposal document
Context: Development of a backend for Bounty Manager to reduce friction and provide an easy and user-friendly solution for curators. The budget includes development and maintenance for 12 months.
Who we are: Galaniprojects GmbH, established in 2006, offers software development, project management, quality assurance, and UI/UX design. They have been working on the KILT Parachain and building Bounty Manager on Polkadot since 2024. Visit their website here.

Appendants

1

#1

2d ago

🟢 1 • 🔴 1 • ⚪️ 6
6 members abstained, higher than the 5-member threshold.
Vote #1: ABSTAIN
10 available members.
No CoI reported. DV delegation exercised.
https://polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic/26216949-2
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1564#2

Cast your votesingle

Votes·9

1ZSP...vx6w

1ZSP...vx6w

1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w

Abstain

# 3

I'm generally favorable towards this, as I believe the features listed can potentially help bounties. However, I would like to see that the team has reached out and gotten feedback and interest from current bounties to use the particular features listed in this proposal.

1xzc...1bX6

1xzc...1bX6

1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6

Abstain

# 3

We would like to see if other bounties think these features would be useful.

167Y...TY9F

167Y...TY9F

167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F

Abstain

# 3

No support for Kusama, any reasons for that? I do know this tool will alleviate bounty management along with the multisign interface to do so, I feel the UX is not at the level i would like it to be and will like this tool to be linked with the RFP submitting tool that is being developed and incorporated into this solution. I feel the asking price is too steep for what the delivery of next functionality is. I would gladly change my abstain to Aye if some or all my feeback is incorporated in a changed proposal.

14gM...deVb

14gM...deVb

14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb

Abstain

# 3

Abstain due to COI. Subsquare has similar features.

12s6...nE8h

12s6...nE8h

12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h

Aye

# 1

We found the bounty tools very helpful, as bounties are the Treasury's end goal. The price is reasonable, so we vote AYE.

14Gn...YLEh

14Gn...YLEh

14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh

Abstain

# 3

I find these tools interesting, but I also share the doubt of the rest of the DAO members. Is this a product that bounties really need and are asking for?

12Kt...DCoJ

12Kt...DCoJ

12KtA8mtfsK1CyQb4utLiwG3ao22z77w2cM2GqnaL2RiDCoJ

Nay

# 2

The UI/UX is still lackluster, with confusing flows and dated design that hasn’t meaningfully improved since the last funding request. Given the time between proposals, there’s been more than enough opportunity to refine the look, feel, and usability, even on a bootstrapped/non-existent budget, but those issues remain unresolved. Rather than fund a separate, hard-to-navigate tool with low adoption potential, I’d rather see these features integrated into existing OpenGov platforms, where the design is cleaner, the experience more intuitive, and the platform already trusted and used by the community.

15fT...yBzL

15fT...yBzL

15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL

Abstain

# 3

13ED...KQbF

13ED...KQbF

13EDmaUe89xXocPppFmuoAZaCsckaJy3deAyVyiykk1zKQbF

Abstain

# 3

Yes, would agree with William here- some feedback from bounties on the specific tools would be helpful.

Discussions·0

No current comments

Information

Snapshot

IPFS

Timestamp

Created

May 13 2025 19:06

Start date

May 13 2025 00:00

End date

Jun 12 2025 00:00

Results

Voters

9

one-person-one-vote

Aye

1 VOTE

Nay

1 VOTE

Abstain

7 VOTE

Product

Resources

Social Links

Contact

© 2025 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.