[WFC] DOT #1608 - Polkadot Community Foundation: Polkadot Payment Card

OpenSquare

Discussions

13zn...P5ju

End

active

Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1608

The Polkadot Community Foundation has proposed a plan to launch a "Polkadot" branded payment card for the Polkadot ecosystem. This non-custodial payment card will be issued globally and work anywhere Visa is accepted. It will be compatible with Apple Pay and Google Pay, and users will only pay a small transaction fee (under 1%). The card will be powered by smart contracts and allow users to hold and pay with USDC. The Polkadot Community Foundation has chosen Baanx as the card provider and issuer, and the card program will be managed by CL, a brand of Baanx. The card will be a debit card using the Visa network and will carry no other branding. There will be no cost to the Polkadot Treasury for the origination and setup of this card program. The card program aims to provide an alternative to traditional banking and increase the usability of the Polkadot ecosystem for payments and DeFi.

Appendants

3d ago

🟢 0 • 🔴 3 • ⚪️ 6
6 members abstained, higher than the 5-member threshold.
Vote #1: ABSTAIN
10 available members.
No CoI reported. DV delegation exercised.
https://polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic/26531723-4
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1608#2

Cast your votesingle

Votes·9

1ZSP...vx6w

1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w

Nay

# 2

It seems to me that Autonomous projects should be a neutral executor/facilitator of Polkadot governance, rather than a proposer. Would like to understand more why Autonomous is proposing this, e.g. where the demand came from, and how the provider selection occured (RFP?). It mentions months of due diligence, but the DD report is not shared.

167Y...TY9F

167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F

Abstain

# 3

I'm ambivalent with the notion of do "we need this", and is this going to bring more people to polkadot?

1xzc...1bX6

1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6

Abstain

# 3

14gM...deVb

14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb

Nay

# 2

I don't think it makes much sense considering the card will spend USDC on EVM contracts. The only attractive point to me is the polkadot x visa logo on the card, but why this card can introduce new users? I'm not sure it will increase polkadot's adoption.

14Gn...YLEh

14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh

Abstain

# 3

I share the same doubts that the rest of member of the DAO had shared here. I am not very sure of the Polkadot benefit here.

13ED...KQbF

13EDmaUe89xXocPppFmuoAZaCsckaJy3deAyVyiykk1zKQbF

Abstain

# 3

unclear on value.

12s6...nE8h

12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h

Abstain

# 3

Once the proposal refers to the due diligence, for more clarity, it should be included in the proposal or as a part of the proposal, so even OpenGov participants can decide whether the results of DD are relevant or not. Therefore we abstain.

12Kt...DCoJ

12KtA8mtfsK1CyQb4utLiwG3ao22z77w2cM2GqnaL2RiDCoJ

Nay

# 2

autonomous projects role is to be a neutral facilitator in governance, so it’s a bit surprising to see them in the proposer role here. would be helpful to understand where the initial demand came from, how the provider was selected, and whether there was an open process. the post mentions due diligence, but the report doesn’t seem to be shared.

15fT...yBzL

15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL

Abstain

# 3

I don't feel strongly in either direction. I don't find payment cards an interesting technology, but I see the possibility of contribution toward mass adoption through infrastructure rails. I abstain.