[MS] DOT #1839 - Polkassembly — Continuity Settlement & Transition Proposal
[MS] DOT #1839 - Polkassembly — Continuity Settlement & Transition Proposal
active
Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1839

  • Polkassembly is asking for $62,700.
  • The money will pay people for work they already did on OpenGov.
  • It will also cover legal and closing costs.
  • This helps finish their current work responsibly.
Cast your votesingle
Results
Voters
4
one-person-one-vote
Information
Members
7
Timestamp
Created
Feb 10 2026 18:29
Start date
Feb 10 2026 00:00
End date
Apr 11 2026 00:00

Votes·4

14Gn...YLEh
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh
Abstain
Abstain

I really can't find a clear reason to approve this Polkassembly budget, after everything that has already been approved for the project.
However, I am not in favor of a clear NAY vote, as I believe that Polkassembly has not been a negative force for the ecosystem, as can be seen in various comments within the original OpenGov post.

167Y...TY9F
167Y...TY9F
167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F
Nay
Nay

We have a need and they served that need in a reactive way, when the funds dry up this is what happens. should have focused on a solution that served opengov better... so it could have self-sustained.

14gM...deVb
14gM...deVb
14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb
Abstain
Abstain

COI

12s6...nE8h
12s6...nE8h
12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h
Abstain
Abstain

Not easy to say this (and to hear this), but right now teams need to focus on self-sustainability.

Discussions·0

No current comment data
Information
Members
7
Timestamp
Created
Feb 10 2026 18:29
Start date
Feb 10 2026 00:00
End date
Apr 11 2026 00:00
Results
Voters
4
one-person-one-vote
© 2026 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.