Personally, I believe that it is the community itself that should decide this, not the DVs.

I would like to learn more about this, please reach up to permanence for Office hr, so we can have a conversation

We are not sure about this.

leaning towards option A but abstain for now, waiting to see what other smarter people have to say about the two options

Also leaning towards option A, but I find the discussion premature. Hopefully we should be able to first experience JAM on a testnet, or testnets. This is a big decision and it should probably be discussed over a long period of time with multiple parties involved. It is not even possible for the community to understand whether the options provided here are covering all of the possibilities. Aye to discussing and evaluating alternatives, nay to the decision being rushed and narrowed down to what's being proposed in these two proposals. I abstain on Option A, nay on option B.

We need more information for the decision.

Looking for tokenholders to weigh in and decide

I'm up for breaking Kusama JAM, also like the idea that it can serve as a cheaper test environment, which is what Kusama is supposed to be anyways,