[BS] DOT #1487 - Paseo - Developer Testnet Bounty Top-up Request

OpenSquare

Discussions

13zn...P5ju

Terminated 13d 15hrs ago

terminated

Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1487

Paseo Network wants to keep doing good work in 2025 and needs money to do it.
They are asking for $640,000 from the Polkadot treasury to pay for their operations.
The money will be used to pay for services every three months for a whole year.
They plan to make it easier to manage money by making some changes.
These changes include using new helpers, paying at the end of each quarter, and making payments automatic.
They also want to make sure the people providing services are doing a good job.
Everyone interested can read more about the proposal and share their thoughts.

Optionssingle

Votes·9

167Y...TY9F

167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F

Abstain

# 3

for this i will like the proposer to ask for USDT, this is a bounty and should not gamble with Dot flustuations.

1ZSP...vx6w

1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w

Aye

# 1

Paseo is important as a testnet

14gM...deVb

14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb

Aye

# 1

It's good to keep more testnets, but I can not recall why rococo was deprecated and why paseo is better.

14Gn...YLEh

14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh

Abstain

# 3

I am a little concerned about the high amount of the proposal, although I am not unaware of the value and importance of funding a testnet such as Paseo.

1xzc...1bX6

1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6

Aye

# 1

Paseo is important as a testnet.

13ED...KQbF

13EDmaUe89xXocPppFmuoAZaCsckaJy3deAyVyiykk1zKQbF

Abstain

# 3

Agree with Jose on this.

12s6...nE8h

12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h

Aye

# 1

We support this proposal as we see Paseo as an important piece of the puzzle for Polkadot.

12Hi...E9N3

12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3

Aye

# 1

Paseo is an important test net but I still struggle to understand not asking for stablecoins with projects which have a clear budget at the time of being proposed, I'm starting to wonder if this is specifically requested or something, will the treasury have a stablecoin flow problem after the two large stablecoin bounties pass or something?

15fT...yBzL

15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL

Aye

# 1

Paseo is a critical part of the infrastructure that hosts 4 system parachains and 22 parachains. Detailed costs breakdown included, and more than half ($360K) of the total budget is for runtime maintenance and support. A curator board more than 4 might suit better considering the size of the bounty. Aye.