https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1724
🟢 1 • 🔴 3 • ⚪️ 1
Required majority (more than 50%) of non-abstain votes not met.
Vote #1: NAY
8 available members.
No CoI reported. DV delegation exercised.
https://polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic/27624229-2
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1724#3
Collab tool for the Jam implementers.
I'm not sure this tool has a high priority for the community.
There is not enough clarity regarding JAM economics, its token, and the relation to DOT. Until then, the JAM-related funding should be carried out through the JAM prize budget.
I am agree with Kukabi here in the point that any JAM funding should be going through the JAM prize budget.
Generally supportive of the effort, targeting awareness for JAM. If it's truly for a dev audience that focuses on JAM awareness, would suggest a domain name targeted to the purpose and some words on who the target customer is and what benefit they get.
We also think that JAM funding should be covered through JAM prize budget. Nay.
Agree that this is a cool tool for JAM implementers
There is already a very substantial JAM Implementer's budget that this would be much more suited to, until JAM is live and running I don't really see why this should be funded through the treasury?
