We think this proposal strengthens the Ethereum <> Polkadot Narrative. We also appreciate how the proposer made changes based on feedback. It is a good idea to request stablecoin payments. It is ok if the last payment is in DOT. However, we would like to have an estimate in the future on how much it will cost to keep Snowbridge fully operational.

I still have worries how polkadot balance supports between commercial bridges like hyperbridge, darwinia and Snowbridge.

Supportive, given the statement from Parity's Bridge team stating it would cost the same amount for Parity to do this internally

After the adjustments made to divide the payments, making the proposals more manageable for the community, I plan to vote AYE here.

Can change Vote base on questions to the team after our ope office all.

I left a series of questions under the referendum. I still find the solution overpriced, and I'm not fully satisfied with all of the line items, but at this moment I believe that the team needs to be supported. A cautious aye.

Parity Bridges’ support underscores its infrastructure value but since I am not an expert in this area I still wish to abstain.

We cannot support this proposal as it stands because adding support for major Ethereum L2s (Base, Arbitrum, Optimism) should be the absolute top priority, not something scheduled for completion a year from now. Without faster L2 integration, we do not believe the funding request reflects user needs, and would only back the proposal if priorities shift immediately. EDIT: The team has said that they will start Ethereum L2 integration right after completing Snowbridge V2. Under these circumstances, we have changed our vote to 'AYE'. This is exactly what Polkadot needs right now.

AYE after the new payment schedule.

Support this initiative