[MS] DOT #1509 - Substrate Asset Game Engine (SAGE)

OpenSquare

Discussions

13zn...P5ju

End

active

Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1509

The Substrate Asset Game Engine (SAGE) helps people make games easily.
It has been created by Ajuna Network to make game development fun and simple.
They’re asking for 80,000 USDT to improve SAGE and make two example games.
The games "Full House Fury" and "Casino Jam" show how SAGE works.
SAGE lets developers quickly turn cool ideas into real games.
It makes games that can work with blockchain technology, which is special.
SAGE is free for everyone to use and learn from.
The goal is to make gaming on Polkadot fun and creative for everyone.

Appendants

3d ago

🟢 3 • 🔴 3 • ⚪️ 4
50% quorum not met.
Vote #1: NAY
No CoI reported. DV delegation exercised.
https://polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic/25632036-2
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1509#3

Cast your votesingle

Votes·10

1ZSP...vx6w

1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w

Nay

# 2

I would like to support the work of a longstanding team in Polkadot, but it's difficult to see the ROI in this spend, especially as it would require a gamemaker to stand up an appchain in order to deploy the pallet (open to being convinced). I believe this year it's better to concentrate efforts (including gaming) on Polkadot Hub.

12Hi...E9N3

12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3

Nay

# 2

As far as I remember Ajun Network had a successful token sale and has a treasury and everything, so I don't really understand why they can't fund this themselves?

1xzc...1bX6

1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6

Aye

# 1

We think the ask is reasonable. However, we think there will need to be a good strategy to get developers to use this tool.

14Gn...YLEh

14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh

Nay

# 2

I'm not really clear on the necessity of this development for the Polkadot ecosystem in general. Beyond whether or not it benefits Ajuna Network, I would like to see Games Bounty's involvement in the situation, to understand if this really benefits the entire ecosystem. The fact that I don't see Games Bounty involved in the proposal, makes me position myself in a NAY.

14gM...deVb

14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb

Abstain

# 3

No strong opinions.

13ED...KQbF

13EDmaUe89xXocPppFmuoAZaCsckaJy3deAyVyiykk1zKQbF

Abstain

# 3

12s6...nE8h

12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h

Aye

# 1

This can help some small builders reduce friction in building games, so we support this.

167Y...TY9F

167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F

Aye

# 1

I do believe this is necessary for small groups playing games, without signing every move, this also can be used to establish groups sharing 1 Dapplication.

12Kt...DCoJ

12KtA8mtfsK1CyQb4utLiwG3ao22z77w2cM2GqnaL2RiDCoJ

Abstain

# 3

I'm not yet fully convinced this is the most effective use of Treasury funds at this time. That said, I remain open-minded and would welcome the team to present during one of our DAO's Open Hour call slots so we can better understand the proposal.

15fT...yBzL

15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL

Abstain

# 3

Pro: reasonable price tag, experienced ecosystem players, technical proficiency. Con: unprepared for marketing and planning the solution to developers, misalignment with DOT Play. Abstain.