[WFC] DOT #1754 - AI Delegate Conflict of Interest Detection Protocol

OpenSquare

Discussions

13zn...P5ju

End

active

Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1754

This proposal makes rules for AI helpers in Polkadot's government.
It says AI helpers should not vote on things that affect themselves.
Everyone must show who is helping make decisions, including both people and AI.
The rules help keep voting fair and honest.
It matches Polkadot's values of being open and responsible.
No new tech is needed right away, but tools can be built later.
If passed, the rules start right away.
This helps Polkadot be a leader in using AI safely.

Cast your votesingle

Results

Voters

one-person-one-vote

Information

IPFS

#QmWCoGG

Members

Timestamp

Created

Sep 16 2025 04:32

Start date

Sep 16 2025 00:00

End date

Nov 15 2025 00:00

Votes·2

167Y...TY9F

167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F

Abstain

I do think we do need to mature has a community to have this on the table. I do like the transparency part a lot that is the only reason why I'm abstaining and not voting Nay. If there is something to hide that is called secrecy, not privacy.

15fT...yBzL

15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL

Abstain

I think it's valuable and forward-thinking to be thinking about CoI cases in AI delegates' voting mechanisms, but I don't really find it enforceable in an on-chain manner. This proposal seems to be targeting W3F delegations, which may be eligible for such regulation, but delegations from other on-chain likely will not be. Such cases will need to be resolved through off-chain consensus and social enforcement, and I hopw voters with significant voting power would intervene in cases of severe CoI involving algorithmic delegates. I abstain.