I do think we do need to mature has a community to have this on the table. I do like the transparency part a lot that is the only reason why I'm abstaining and not voting Nay. If there is something to hide that is called secrecy, not privacy.

I think it's valuable and forward-thinking to be thinking about CoI cases in AI delegates' voting mechanisms, but I don't really find it enforceable in an on-chain manner. This proposal seems to be targeting W3F delegations, which may be eligible for such regulation, but delegations from other on-chain likely will not be. Such cases will need to be resolved through off-chain consensus and social enforcement, and I hopw voters with significant voting power would intervene in cases of severe CoI involving algorithmic delegates. I abstain.

I think the goal it seeks to achieve is very positive, however, I share the view of the other DAO members when they mention the efficiency that this type of proposal could have. To what extent could AI really know and understand the information being presented? What capacity does it have to see on-chain information?

Less idealism. A good system make balance between interests of various parties. We should not expect morality will work in a well designed economic system.