[MS] DOT #1586 - Merkle Science paving the way for institutional adoption and DeFi Innovation

OpenSquare

Discussions

13zn...P5ju

End

active

Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1586

Merkle Science has a Medium Spender Proposal for the Polkadot community to support the growth of the Asset Hub. They will help with compliance and security, making it easier for financial institutions and startups to work within the Polkadot ecosystem. This will help protect users and promote DeFi innovation. They are also working on cross-chain tracing solutions to improve security. You can find more information on their proposal and contact them through the provided links.

Appendants

16d ago

🟢 0 • 🔴 4 • ⚪️ 3
5-member quorum not met.
Vote #1: NAY
10 available members.
No CoI reported. DV delegation exercised.
https://polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic/26373984-3
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1586#6

Cast your votesingle

Votes·10

167Y...TY9F

167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F

Abstain

# 3

Seems there is some misleading information in the proposal, will let other DAO members decide.

1xzc...1bX6

1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6

Nay

# 2

The proposal seems to contain misleading information.

1ZSP...vx6w

1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w

Abstain

# 3

I would like to see W3F and Parity confirm that they have approached Merkle Science to bring support to Asset Hub, given this is referenced in the proposal but doesn't have attribution.

15fT...yBzL

15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL

Nay

# 2

Merkle Science should develop Asset Hub support themselves as a business investment, and then the interested teams (Helikon would be one) should purchase licenses from them. With this proposal, Merkle Science is basically making the treasury pay for their own business assets, and also charging the treasury for the licenses to be provided for the listed Polkadot teams. Totally unfair. Nay.

14Gn...YLEh

14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh

Abstain

# 3

I feel that I am not clear on the picture raised by Merkle Science within the process. I prefer to abstain.

14gM...deVb

14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb

Nay

# 2

The proposed content is not much clear and some parts are not attractive to me. In milestone 1, the price for token transaction monitoring and fund flow analysis looks too high.