[WC] DOT #1510 - Set Snowbridge-wrapped USDC & USDT as sufficient assets, set their ED to $0.01, and set their metadata on Asset Hub

13zn...P5ju

End in 23d

active

Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1510

The proposal is about adding new types of wrapped money called USDC and USDT on the Polkadot platform.
USDC and USDT are set to be important and useful assets.
The minimum amount needed to keep these assets is just $0.01.
Their names, symbols, and that they have 6 decimal places will be officially noted.
Other important assets like ETH and KSM are also recognized on Polkadot.
This change is believed to help people use valuable and stable assets easily.
The proposal can be changed later if needed.

Cast your votesingle

Votes·9

167Y...TY9F

167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F

Aye

# 1

this will allow those usd* assets coming from Eth to be wrapped, one problem they have is the usdc/t coming from exchanges can't be ported to ethereum through snowbridge.

12Hi...E9N3

12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3

Aye

# 1

Yes to anything that makes it easier to port assets from other chains to Polkadot.

1xzc...1bX6

1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6

Aye

# 1

Yes because it makes it easier to port assets from other chains to Polkadot.

14Gn...YLEh

14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh

Aye

# 1

Clear AYE for me.

1ZSP...vx6w

1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w

Aye

# 1

Thank you for presenting arguments for and against in the proposal. Generally it seems non-ideal to have wrapped versions of USDC and USDT, but at the moment I believe it makes sense to make them sufficient.