[SS] DOT #1825 - [Small Spender] Referendum #1825
[SS] DOT #1825 - [Small Spender] Referendum #1825
active
Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1825

  • Squidsway is a project to improve Polkadot's governance.
  • It will make a tool that collects data about how people vote and act.
  • The tool will help find problems and make governance better.
  • It will also create reports every few months to share what is learned.
  • The tool will be free for anyone to use and will be open source.
  • This first part asks for $8,000 to build a simple version of the tool.
  • The goal is to help Polkadot lead in good governance.
Appendants
2
#1
10d ago

Vote #1 submitted.
```
SMALL SPENDER

8 available members
🟢 0 • 🔴 1 • ⚪️ 2
✓ ≥37.5% required participation met
▶ Majority of all votes is abstain
⚪ ABSTAIN

No CoI reported. DV delegation exercised.
https://assethub-polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic/10921757-3
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1825#2
#2
10d ago

Vote #2 submitted.
```
SMALL SPENDER

8 available members
🟢 0 • 🔴 2 • ⚪️ 2
✓ ≥37.5% required participation met
✘ Ayes ≤50.0% of non-abstain votes
▶ Aye/abstain conditions not met
🔴 NAY

No CoI reported. DV delegation exercised.
https://assethub-polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic/10923332-2
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1825#3
Cast your votesingle
Results
Voters
5
one-person-one-vote
Information
Members
9
Timestamp
Created
Dec 21 2025 19:33
Start date
Dec 21 2025 00:00
End date
Feb 19 2026 00:00

Votes·5

15fT...yBzL
15fT...yBzL
15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL
Nay
Nay

I'm pretty sure we're not short of governance tooling at this moment. If the proposer is confident that this is a novel tool that would change the way the community does governance, or that would greatly benefit the decision making processes, they should first publish a working MVP/PoC and share it with the community. If it gets traction, then a grant may become a viable path. Nay for now.

14gM...deVb
14gM...deVb
14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb
Abstain
Abstain

Abstain due I'm from a team who develop governance tools. Considering current treasury status, it may not have a high priority.

12Hi...E9N3
12Hi...E9N3
12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3
Abstain
Abstain

I find any LLM based auto-gov tool to be at complete odds to the direction Polkadot is going with proof-of-persoonhood etc. I don't mind LLM chatbots to create summaries etc. but curating and presenting data with objectivity claims is a line I would rather not cross.

With that being said, I'll keep an eye on the questions from the community and interactions from the proposer before casting a final vote, abstain for now.

14Gn...YLEh
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh
Nay
Nay

As I have said repeatedly, I believe we should stop funding tools to improve Polkadot governance. Polkadot governance is not Polkadot's ultimate goal.

12s6...nE8h
12s6...nE8h
12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h
Nay
Nay

We agree with Ezio, no more OpenGov tools are needed right now. We think this new tool won't solve any pain point of Polkadot.

Discussions·0

No current comment data
...
Information
Members
9
Timestamp
Created
Dec 21 2025 19:33
Start date
Dec 21 2025 00:00
End date
Feb 19 2026 00:00
Results
Voters
5
one-person-one-vote
© 2026 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.