I think a community criticism of not having enough legal professionals on the curator set may still remain, but given the bounty passed, I believe we can start operations and give the bounty a chance to prove itself.

We would like to know some of the curators' erudition before approving them. Found none in the proposal itself. For that reason we abstain.

We were against the bounty in the first place. Therefore we will remain consistent and vote against this ref.

This is needed and it will evolve to something that we all can tap into.

There's one addition to the bounty board from Scytale, the rest was implicitly approved by the community voting on the original bounty referendum. I'm not very confident that 2 out of 4 curators really could really be considered a bounty board, but will Aye this nonetheless. The activity will be evaluated by the community.

Most of these ecosystem agents have proven themselves as reliable and we would like to see how they can help support the community.

I just don't see how such a bounty systems will work to get quality legal service

Personally, I do not believe that the proposed curators have the expertise required, as there is no legal background in most of them.