[BS] KSM #516 - DotShield - Take back control of your community
active
Description

https://kusama.subsquare.io/referenda/516

DotShield is a new Web3 bot designed to improve security in Telegram and Discord communities within the Polkadot and Kusama ecosystem. It helps with moderation, verification, and scam prevention. Here are some key points about DotShield:

  1. It solves the problem of existing bots that use easy-to-bypass captchas instead of Web3 verification.
  2. DotShield allows groups to set their own criteria for membership, like balance thresholds and council membership.
  3. It is important because it helps protect Web3 communities from spam, bot invasions, and scams.
  4. The creator of DotShield learned to code to make this solution after being frustrated with existing options.
  5. DotShield has features like dynamic chain state verification, single sign-in for Web3 users, flexible moderation, scam prevention, and expansion to Discord.
  6. The creator is asking for funding to support the deployment and expansion of DotShield.
  7. Users have given DotShield good feedback, with suggestions for improvement like more detailed guides and better transparency about data handling.
  8. Many users would recommend DotShield to others and support its adoption across the Polkadot ecosystem.
Appendants
2
#1
9h ago

🟢 4 • 🔴 4 • ⚪️ 2
60% quorum not met.
Vote #1: NAY
No CoI reported. DV delegation exercised.
https://kusama.subscan.io/extrinsic/27950829-2
https://kusama.subsquare.io/referenda/516#3

#2
8h ago

🟢 4 • 🔴 4 • ⚪️ 2
60% quorum not met.
Vote #2: NAY
No CoI reported. DV delegation exercised.
https://kusama.subscan.io/extrinsic/27951104-2
Feedback skipped.

Cast your votesingle

Votes·10

167Y...TY9F
167Y...TY9F
167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F
Aye
# 1
Anything to fight scams getting into the ecosystems is more than welcome.
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w
Nay
# 2
I think it's a great initiative, and a good way to . However, I believe a new project like this should be open source from the beginning, especially at the point where retroactive funding is requested. Open Source allows anyone to self-host, anyone to verify bugs/security risks and provides a guarantee that there is no untoward user tracking (not that we suspect any).
1xzc...1bX6
1xzc...1bX6
1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6
Abstain
# 3
This looks like a useful initiative. However, we would like more details about which groups might want to use it.
14gM...deVb
14gM...deVb
14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb
Nay
# 2
The ROI of this proposal is not attractive to me. If it's really useful to any communities, let the communities pay it and they can come to treasury.
13ED...KQbF
13ED...KQbF
13EDmaUe89xXocPppFmuoAZaCsckaJy3deAyVyiykk1zKQbF
Aye
# 1
After the call with Spicy, we feel this is a great addition.
12Hi...E9N3
12Hi...E9N3
12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3
Aye
# 1
Looks like a good alternative to existing telegram bots, I dislike telegram/discord to begin with and believe that blockchain communities should move unto alternative platforms for more secure and efficient communication but if it solves a problem that exists today and the ask is reasonable with an already working product, sounds great.
12s6...nE8h
12s6...nE8h
12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h
Aye
# 1
After yesterday's call, we are even more convinced of the benefits of this tool. Quite reasonable budget too.
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn...YLEh
5FLUy6yhLu63fwkPsBjvwJbaJVpw6ij7kQaJsrgVcy1NN2vi
Nay
# 2
Honestly, the proposal doesn't really convince me. I understand the importance of scam protection within the user communities, but, I feel that it is a tool that will not really achieve its goal. I feel that there are many unofficial Polkadot communities, I myself belong to about 10 within the Spanish speaking ecosystem, and I don't see the need to adopt this type of tool and I also perceive that its implementation will be impractical.
12Kt...DCoJ
12Kt...DCoJ
5DPb1oWpp63XmSQ57GqLanRtjB2PHoZnx7cY7YoDmwQC2ZCM
Abstain
# 3
I'm unsure whether this proposal should be routed through the Anti-Scam team, especially given their recent top-up approval and related tasks. Have you consulted with them yet? If so, I’d be interested to hear their perspective. I'm abstaining for now until I better understand the context. While I absolutely support the importance of security, I’m not fully convinced the timing and scope of this request are aligned just yet.
15fT...yBzL
15fT...yBzL
5GjA8hoXjXzt3CEVdhiThoZPqCgQRiAdPDDDMKRJetjNndKh
Nay
# 2
The project should be open-sourced. Nay for this reason. Otherwise it can be very useful, NFT-gated access especially sounds interesting to me.

Discussions·0

No current comments
Information
Snapshot
Timestamp
Created
Apr 09 2025 04:01
Start date
Apr 09 2025 00:00
End date
May 09 2025 00:00
Results
Voters
10
one-person-one-vote
Aye
4 VOTE
 
Nay
4 VOTE
 
Abstain
2 VOTE
 
© 2025 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.