[WFC] KSM #574 - Kusama JAM Upgrade: Option B - Full power and Polkadot friendly
Terminated 
terminated
Description

https://kusama.subsquare.io/referenda/574

  • Kusama upgrades to work with Polkadot, sharing security costs
  • Uses a system called JAM that can start small and grow
  • Both KSM and DOT tokens can be used together
  • Saves money by splitting security costs between networks
  • Needs both communities to agree on fair rules
  • Offers better security and teamwork between chains
  • Could become a model for other networks to join
  • Solves Kusama's high security expenses problem
Appendants
1
#1
18d ago

🟢 0 • 🔴 1 • ⚪️ 6
6 members abstained, higher than the 5-member threshold.
Vote #1: ABSTAIN
10 available members.
No CoI reported. DV delegation exercised.
https://kusama.subscan.io/extrinsic/29708490-2
https://kusama.subsquare.io/referenda/574#1

Optionssingle

Votes·10

14gM...deVb
14gM...deVb
14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb
Nay
Nay
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh
Abstain
Abstain

Personally, I believe that it is the community itself that should decide this, not the DVs.

167Y...TY9F
167Y...TY9F
167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F
Abstain
Abstain

Again I would like to know more, can you book a cal in the our office hr?

1xzc...1bX6
1xzc...1bX6
1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6
Abstain
Abstain

We are not sure about this.

12Kt...DCoJ
12Kt...DCoJ
12KtA8mtfsK1CyQb4utLiwG3ao22z77w2cM2GqnaL2RiDCoJ
Abstain
Abstain

leaning towards option A but abstain for now, waiting to see what other smarter people have to say about the two options

15fT...yBzL
15fT...yBzL
15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL
Abstain
Abstain

Also leaning towards option A, but I find the discussion premature. Hopefully we should be able to first experience JAM on a testnet, or testnets. This is a big decision and it should probably be discussed over a long period of time with multiple parties involved. It is not even possible for the community to understand whether the options provided here are covering all of the possibilities. Aye to discussing and evaluating alternatives, nay to the decision being rushed and narrowed down to what's being proposed in these two proposals. I abstain on Option A, nay on option B.

12s6...nE8h
12s6...nE8h
12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h
Abstain
Abstain

We need more info for the decision.

1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w
Abstain
Abstain

Looking for tokenholders to weigh in and decide

12Hi...E9N3
12Hi...E9N3
12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3
Nay
Nay

Voted for option A.

13ED...KQbF
13ED...KQbF
13EDmaUe89xXocPppFmuoAZaCsckaJy3deAyVyiykk1zKQbF
Abstain
Abstain

Discussions·0

No current comments
Information
Members
9
Timestamp
Created
Aug 07 2025 07:10
Start date
Aug 07 2025 00:00
End date
Oct 06 2025 00:00
Results
Voters
10
one-person-one-vote
Aye
0 VOTE
 
Nay
2 VOTE
 
Abstain
8 VOTE
 
© 2025 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.