[MS] DOT #1440 - Giant Squid Phase 2

OpenSquare

Discussions

13zn...P5ju

End in 22d

active

Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1440

LimeChain is now in charge of GiantSquid, a tool that helps find data in the Polkadot system.
They created a report about their work and talked to users to gather feedback.
Based on this feedback, they have a new plan called "Phase 2 for Giant Squid."
Phase 2 includes new features like making it easier to find cross-chain transfers and track staking and voting.
They will also make a new table to show all account events at once, which will be easier to use.
They are asking for 169,520 USDC to help pay for the new features and other costs.
Feedback from the community is very welcome, and they hope to turn it into a treasury proposal.

Cast your votesingle

Votes·7

1xzc...1bX6

1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6

Abstain

# 3

We are not sure how much this is needed.

1ZSP...vx6w

1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w

Aye

# 1

I'm generally supportive here, given the reasonable price and difficulty for new dapp/wallet developers to index this kind of info. However, it doesn't seem to take into account the switch of staking and governance/etc to Polkadot Hub. That should be covered also in this proposal, given the period of performance.

14Gn...YLEh

14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh

Abstain

# 3

I really like the work that this team has been doing on Polkadot, but I really wonder if it is something that is well focused on what we need in the ecosystem.

12Hi...E9N3

12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3

Aye

# 1

I don't know if there are alternative projects working on indexing and making XCMs searchable, I can see a lot of value for dApps with this to track assets etc. and for users as well to make the whole ecosystem more transperant and easier to read. Other than that solid proposal and experienced team.