[MS] DOT #1489 - PolkaGate MetaMask Snap: Retroactive Funding Proposal (Oct 2024 - Jan 2025)
Terminated 12d 11hrs ago
terminated
Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1489

  • PolkaGate wants $53,600 to improve their MetaMask Snap for Polkadot users.
  • They have added new features like staking and easier money transfers.
  • PolkaGate helps users manage digital assets for Polkadot and Kusama.
  • The team includes experts in engineering, finance, and user experience.
  • Users can sign transactions and manage stakes right in MetaMask.
  • Future features will include token swapping and smarter contracts.
  • They have links for more information, like their official website and social media.
Optionssingle

Votes·9

167Y...TY9F
167Y...TY9F
167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F
Aye
# 1
Metamask is widely used in the Ethereum eco, Wallets of this caliber are more than welcome, also really like that this is a retroactive project, demonstrating their commitment to the Polkadot ecosystem.
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w
Abstain
# 3
I appreciate the effort to reach out to Metamask users, but I would prefer to see this be part of a user acquisition campaign (with related goals/targets), rather than just a technical compatibility exercise.
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh
Aye
# 1
It is not an unreasonable amount that is being asked and it is also to address an arrival to one of the most popular wallets in the ecosystem, for me it is a clear AYE..
1xzc...1bX6
1xzc...1bX6
1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6
Nay
# 2
We are not sure about the demand for this.
14gM...deVb
14gM...deVb
14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb
Aye
# 1
Their work should be incentivized, but I also agree there are lots of work to do help users integrating with polkadot eco only with Metamask.
13ED...KQbF
13ED...KQbF
13EDmaUe89xXocPppFmuoAZaCsckaJy3deAyVyiykk1zKQbF
Aye
# 1
Snap is good for Polkadot, but would love to also see a better (more visible) UX for Polkadot wallets on metamask. Still an Aye.
12s6...nE8h
12s6...nE8h
12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h
Aye
# 1
We see benefits of this integration. Aye here.
12Hi...E9N3
12Hi...E9N3
12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3
Aye
# 1
Having Polkadot on MetaMask Snap is good for visibility, any development to outreach to more users should be supported based on a cost/opportunity ratio, this is an easy one to support in my opinion, AYE.
15fT...yBzL
15fT...yBzL
15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL
Aye
# 1
Aye. But I agree with Kian's comments that Polkagate should realign in light of the recent negative community feedback.

Discussions·0

No current comments
Information
Snapshot
Timestamp
Created
Mar 12 2025 11:27
Start date
Mar 12 2025 00:00
End date
Apr 11 2025 00:00
Results
Voters
9
one-person-one-vote
Aye
7 VOTE
 
Nay
1 VOTE
 
Abstain
1 VOTE
 
© 2025 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.