[MS] DOT #1489 - PolkaGate MetaMask Snap: Retroactive Funding Proposal (Oct 2024 - Jan 2025)
Terminated 
terminated
Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1489

  • PolkaGate wants $53,600 to improve their MetaMask Snap for Polkadot users.
  • They have added new features like staking and easier money transfers.
  • PolkaGate helps users manage digital assets for Polkadot and Kusama.
  • The team includes experts in engineering, finance, and user experience.
  • Users can sign transactions and manage stakes right in MetaMask.
  • Future features will include token swapping and smarter contracts.
  • They have links for more information, like their official website and social media.
Optionssingle

Votes·9

167Y...TY9F
167Y...TY9F
167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F
Aye
Aye
Metamask is widely used in the Ethereum eco, Wallets of this caliber are more than welcome, also really like that this is a retroactive project, demonstrating their commitment to the Polkadot ecosystem.
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w
Abstain
Abstain
I appreciate the effort to reach out to Metamask users, but I would prefer to see this be part of a user acquisition campaign (with related goals/targets), rather than just a technical compatibility exercise.
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh
Aye
Aye
It is not an unreasonable amount that is being asked and it is also to address an arrival to one of the most popular wallets in the ecosystem, for me it is a clear AYE..
1xzc...1bX6
1xzc...1bX6
1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6
Nay
Nay
We are not sure about the demand for this.
14gM...deVb
14gM...deVb
14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb
Aye
Aye
Their work should be incentivized, but I also agree there are lots of work to do help users integrating with polkadot eco only with Metamask.
13ED...KQbF
13ED...KQbF
13EDmaUe89xXocPppFmuoAZaCsckaJy3deAyVyiykk1zKQbF
Aye
Aye
Snap is good for Polkadot, but would love to also see a better (more visible) UX for Polkadot wallets on metamask. Still an Aye.
12s6...nE8h
12s6...nE8h
12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h
Aye
Aye
We see benefits of this integration. Aye here.
12Hi...E9N3
12Hi...E9N3
12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3
Aye
Aye
Having Polkadot on MetaMask Snap is good for visibility, any development to outreach to more users should be supported based on a cost/opportunity ratio, this is an easy one to support in my opinion, AYE.
15fT...yBzL
15fT...yBzL
15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL
Aye
Aye
Aye. But I agree with Kian's comments that Polkagate should realign in light of the recent negative community feedback.

Discussions·0

No current comments
Information
Snapshot
Members
11
Timestamp
Created
Mar 12 2025 11:27
Start date
Mar 12 2025 00:00
End date
Apr 11 2025 00:00
Results
Voters
9
one-person-one-vote
Aye
7 VOTE
 
Nay
1 VOTE
 
Abstain
1 VOTE
 
© 2025 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.