[MS] DOT #1649 - Polkadot x Discovery Channel: A Tokenization Story
active
Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1649

  • A rare Australian opal will be turned into a Polkadot-themed amulet.
  • It will be shown on Outback Opal Hunters (Discovery Channel).
  • The opal will be split into 100 billion tokens on Polkadot.
  • The Polkadot Treasury will own it, so everyone in the community can have a piece.
  • The amulet will be sold to a Polkadot member for the whole community.
  • It will be displayed at Polkadot events with "As seen on Discovery Channel."
  • This is Polkadot’s first real-world asset (RWA) owned by the Treasury.
  • The show’s director supports sharing opal ownership using blockchain.
Appendants
1
#1
22h ago

🟢 0 • 🔴 6 • ⚪️ 0
5-member quorum not met.
Vote #1: NAY
10 available members.
No CoI reported. DV delegation exercised.
https://polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic/26833043-2
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1649#6

Cast your votesingle

Votes·7

1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w
Nay
Nay
Without being able to situate this in a larger strategy, while an interesting opportunity, I believe the next phase needs to be builder focused rather than creating awareness among the general population.
1xzc...1bX6
1xzc...1bX6
1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6
Nay
Nay
We are unsure of the value this will bring to the ecosystem beyond awareness.
12Hi...E9N3
12Hi...E9N3
12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3
Nay
Nay
You know what, this is the kind of marketing that we should throw $250k at. On a more serious note, the previous similar episode they've done "Digi Diggers Sell First Digital Opal In The Metaverse! | Outback Opal Hunters" doesn't seem to have made an impact in terms of generating interest/clicks/views to justify funding this one and hope for some eyes to turn towards Polkadot.
14gM...deVb
14gM...deVb
14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb
Nay
Nay
Exposure is not a big problem for polkadot currently.
12s6...nE8h
12s6...nE8h
12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h
Nay
Nay

We are fairly certain that the price tag is not worth the approach, especially given the current economic state. Nay, not needed.

14Gn...YLEh
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh
Nay
Nay

I think it's a marketing strategy that we don't need at Polkadot and it won't have the right impact.

12Kt...DCoJ
12Kt...DCoJ
12KtA8mtfsK1CyQb4utLiwG3ao22z77w2cM2GqnaL2RiDCoJ
Abstain
Abstain

i find the idea interesting but can't ignore the fact that programmatic ads could achieve many more views at a much lower cost. abstaining for now as the price seems too high for the current market. would also like more clarity on streaming platform numbers for episode re-runs if available

Discussions·0

No current comments
Information
Members
11
Timestamp
Created
Jul 03 2025 12:37
Start date
Jul 03 2025 00:00
End date
Sep 01 2025 00:00
Results
Voters
7
one-person-one-vote
Aye
0 VOTE
 
Nay
6 VOTE
 
Abstain
1 VOTE
 
© 2025 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.