[WFC] KSM #535 - WFC: Use Decentralized Voices Cohort #5 to drive the evolution of resilient on-chain political parties..
Terminated 
terminated
Description

https://kusama.subsquare.io/referenda/535

  • Polkadot is focusing on resilience and strong on-chain governance.
  • Current Decentralized Voices (DV) groups rely too much on centralized tools.
  • Polkadot can use DV to create strong, on-chain political parties.
  • Kusama Asset Hub needs upgrades to support better DAO tools.
  • Kreivo’s technology can help make these upgrades.
  • New DVs should have clear goals and use only on-chain tools.
  • A step-by-step plan will help transition to resilient DAOs.
Appendants
1
#1
15d ago

🟢 1 • 🔴 4 • ⚪️ 2
6-member quorum not met.
Vote #1: NAY
10 available members.
No CoI reported. DV delegation exercised.
https://kusama.subscan.io/extrinsic/28814131-2
https://kusama.subsquare.io/referenda/535#1

Optionssingle

Votes·9

1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w
Nay
Nay
I'd like to see wide discussion in various channels before approving this WFC; also it's unclear whether or not this WFC affects W3F who delegates dot to DVs
167Y...TY9F
167Y...TY9F
167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F
Aye
Aye
I think Kreivo should be aware that other people are also working on DAO infrastructure in the ecosystem. This is a good conversation opener.
1xzc...1bX6
1xzc...1bX6
1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6
Nay
Nay
We think it would be more prudent do see more discussions around this topic before approving a WFC.
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh
Nay
Nay
I am not very sure about the final scope of this type of proposal, I do not doubt that it is a good topic to start talking about, but I do not feel that we are prepared for what is being proposed.
15fT...yBzL
15fT...yBzL
15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL
Abstain
Abstain
I'm supportive of using ecosystem tools for this purpose. I agree with other members that this should probably be discussed for a longer period of time with multiple parties involved before committing to it though. I abstain.
12Kt...DCoJ
12Kt...DCoJ
12KtA8mtfsK1CyQb4utLiwG3ao22z77w2cM2GqnaL2RiDCoJ
Abstain
Abstain
Interesting experiment though I wonder if this should be discussed more to decide the appropriate path before implementing on-chain.
14gM...deVb
14gM...deVb
14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb
Nay
Nay
I don't think it must be on-chain. Everything on-chain usually means high cost. We need to seek a balance between decentralization and cost. I believe the key point is verifiability. In a off chain environment, it can solve this problem that DAO members sign their votes.
12s6...nE8h
12s6...nE8h
12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h
Nay
Nay
This should be a topic of broader discussion, rather than the WFC proposal.
13ED...KQbF
13ED...KQbF
13EDmaUe89xXocPppFmuoAZaCsckaJy3deAyVyiykk1zKQbF
Nay
Nay
Agree with Polkabiz on this one

Discussions·0

No current comments
Information
Snapshot
Members
11
Timestamp
Created
Jun 10 2025 08:55
Start date
Jun 10 2025 00:00
End date
Aug 09 2025 00:00
Results
Voters
9
one-person-one-vote
Aye
1 VOTE
 
Nay
6 VOTE
 
Abstain
2 VOTE
 
© 2025 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.