[T] DOT #1623 - Exploration of a brand-new direction for Polkadot's Ethereum-compatibility layer
active
Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1623

  • A new idea for Polkadot to work with Ethereum, different from what Parity is doing.
  • Wants to use existing tools to make it safer and faster.
  • Keeps current projects like Moonbeam and Acala happy.
  • Plans to test the idea first with a small budget (30k-60k USDC).
  • Aims to avoid security risks and splits in the Polkadot community.
  • Made by Wei Tang, who knows a lot about Ethereum and Polkadot.
  • The idea is open for discussion and voting by the community.
Appendants
1
#1
4d ago

🟢 0 • 🔴 8 • ⚪️ 0
6-member quorum not met.
Vote #1: NAY
10 available members.
No CoI reported. DV delegation exercised.
https://polkadot.subscan.io/extrinsic/26634323-3
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1623#2

Cast your votesingle

Votes·9

1xzc...1bX6
1xzc...1bX6
1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6
Nay
Nay
Why is this on the treasury track?
12Kt...DCoJ
12Kt...DCoJ
12KtA8mtfsK1CyQb4utLiwG3ao22z77w2cM2GqnaL2RiDCoJ
Nay
Nay
wrong track
14gM...deVb
14gM...deVb
14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb
Nay
Nay
Nay because of wrong track. We need experts to analyze the proposed solutions.
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh
Nay
Nay
12s6...nE8h
12s6...nE8h
12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h
Nay
Nay
More likely a WFC track for this. Nay.
12Hi...E9N3
12Hi...E9N3
12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3
Nay
Nay
13ED...KQbF
13ED...KQbF
13EDmaUe89xXocPppFmuoAZaCsckaJy3deAyVyiykk1zKQbF
Nay
Nay
Wrong track. Nay
167Y...TY9F
167Y...TY9F
167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F
Nay
Nay
wrong place for this.
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w
Aye
Aye
While the track may be in question, the developer is looking for an early signal that this idea may have merit that will be evaluated later for initial funding, and I would like to send the signal that the idea is interesting. I appreciate the new perspective presented here as it brings new capabilities to Polkadot Cloud and presents and upgrade path to existing parachains built on Frontier. I don't think this actually competes with revive, and it instead provides an upgraded EVM environment (vs Solidity compatibility). A downside is maybe fragmentation of Solidity environments.

Discussions·0

No current comments
Information
Snapshot
Members
11
Timestamp
Created
Jun 19 2025 21:18
Start date
Jun 19 2025 00:00
End date
Aug 18 2025 00:00
Results
Voters
9
one-person-one-vote
Aye
1 VOTE
 
Nay
8 VOTE
 
Abstain
0 VOTE
 
© 2025 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.