[BS] DOT #1331 - Ink!ubator 2.0 – Change of curators for bounty #19
End in 1mo
active
Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1331

Summary of Strategy Update

  1. Referendum #1160 Failure and Bounty #19 Status: The execution of Referendum #1160 failed, and Bounty #19 remains open. Instead of opening a new bounty, the team decided to replace the current curator set.

  2. Communication with Curators: The team has communicated their intentions to the current curator set, emphasizing the need for more active and passionate curators.

  3. No Top-Up: The change in curators will not involve additional funds; the focus will be on using existing resources effectively.

  4. Action Plan:

    • A referendum proposing a new curator set will be opened.
    • The current curators will unassign themselves.
    • The new curators will accept their roles.
    • ink!ubator will reopen, with the website updated and new applicants welcomed.
  5. ink!ubator 2.0 Proposal: The proposal aims to continue innovation in the Polkadot ecosystem through ink! smart contracts. It includes ecosystem grants, mentorship, and a streamlined process based on lessons from ink!ubator 1.0.

  6. Curators Panel: The new panel includes experienced individuals from Parity, Web3 Foundation, and other key players in the Polkadot and ink! ecosystems.

  7. Treasury Support: Funding from the Polkadot Treasury is crucial for enabling developers and ensuring growth. The requested support is $600,000 - $1,000,000.

  8. Future Goals: The initiative aims to expand ink!'s influence, foster scalable decentralized solutions, and contribute to global Web3 and blockchain technology advancements.

Cast your votesingle

Votes·4

1xzc...1bX6
1xzc...1bX6
1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6
Aye
# 1
We support this list of curators. We look forward to seeing what will come out pf this bounty.
167Y...TY9F
167Y...TY9F
167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F
Aye
# 1
Trusted known by the community curators, able to move Ink! forward.
13ED...KQbF
13ED...KQbF
13EDmaUe89xXocPppFmuoAZaCsckaJy3deAyVyiykk1zKQbF
Nay
# 2
In general, we had a bad experience with the ink!ubator program. This was largely due to the lack of professionalism and follow through. Although we believe in ink! and some of the curators, there are others that are not best suited for the development of the ecosystem.Hard nay.
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w
Abstain
# 3
I see this as an experiment. The benefit is to have another interoperable language on PVM, which illustrates the capabilities of the new architecture. The downside is I don't think I see enough of a defined plan/strategy to get broader ink adoption, which I think is needed to flourish.

Discussions·0

No current comments
...
Information
Snapshot
Timestamp
Created
Dec 20 2024 19:14
Start date
Dec 20 2024 00:00
End date
Jan 19 2025 00:00
Results
Voters
4
one-person-one-vote
Aye
2 VOTE
 
Nay
1 VOTE
 
Abstain
1 VOTE
 
© 2024 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.