DOT Ref #1247 - Fellowship Admin
Ended 2d 14hrs ago
closed
Optionsmultiple

Votes·10

1xzc...1bX6
1xzc...1bX6
1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6
Abstain
# 3
PolkaBiz abstains for conflict of interests of one of it's members.
14gM...deVb
14gM...deVb
14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb
Nay
# 2
1433...pWXn
1433...pWXn
14333MZvbGkcq5CZ8fYHZiFYwHNDaW3uiErDKMb7oqnupWXn
Nay
# 2
13ED...KQbF
13ED...KQbF
13EDmaUe89xXocPppFmuoAZaCsckaJy3deAyVyiykk1zKQbF
Nay
# 2
We feel the structure for compensation should be merit based, but the HA's are high quality. They should be allowed time to prove their worth. To take all down would be a disservice and discredit to their previous and future work. Restructure the compensation, not the HA's.
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w
Abstain
# 3
167Y...TY9F
167Y...TY9F
167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F
Aye
# 1
The process whas rigged and rushed. Some people did cover the cost of proposing some HA so they could have some leveraged over them and did showed.
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh
Abstain
# 3
As HA, I abstain from voting in this vote.
15fT...yBzL
15fT...yBzL
15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL
Aye
# 1
In light of the restructuring of the program, it seems inevitable that the current HAs are going to be removed. Therefore it makes sense to remove the current ambassador set. Aye.
12Hi...E9N3
12Hi...E9N3
12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3
Abstain
# 3
12s6...nE8h
12s6...nE8h
12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h
Abstain
# 3

Discussions·0

No current comments
...
Information
Snapshot
Timestamp
Created
Oct 25 2024 16:23
Start date
Oct 25 2024 16:22
End date
Nov 17 2024 05:00
Results
Voters
10
one-person-one-vote
Aye
2 VOTE
 
Nay
3 VOTE
 
Abstain
5 VOTE
 
© 2024 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.