[MS] DOT #1499 - Retroactive Funding Proposal: Bounty Manager V2.0

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1499

The Retroactive Funding Proposal is for Bounty Manager V2.0 by Galaniprojects GmbH.
They want to receive 64,368 USDC for this project.
The proposal focuses on improving the Bounty Manager software, including a new interface and better features.
It aims to make managing bounties easier for users by having all information in one place.
Galaniprojects GmbH is based in Berlin, Germany, and has been around since 2006.
They work in software development and design for different industries.
You can find more information on their website and details of the proposal online.

12Hi...E9N3

12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3

Aye

# 1

So I like the website but have some comments and suggestions for improvements: 1) I'd like to see a list view instead of grids to make better use of the space 2) A separate list of curators and bounties they're serving on would be great, which would show if there are curators serving on multiple bounties 3) Links to bounty pages and documents 4) sort and filter functionalities to make navigating the bounties easier. I'm sure others will have suggestions as well, it's an OK website with lots of potential at this moment imo.

14Gn...YLEh

14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh

Aye

# 1

I think it is something interesting to improve the transparency and understanding of Polkadot bounties. I agree with what Ionian said, especially point two, in order to better understand the curators that are active in Polkadot..

14gM...deVb

14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb

Abstain

# 3

I like more tools about bounty and governance, but their UI looks still very rough.

167Y...TY9F

167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F

Aye

# 1

Good work, need some UX work on the solution.

12s6...nE8h

12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h

Abstain

# 3

Most probably a proposal for the Polkadot’s DeFi Infrastructure & Tooling Bounty.

1ZSP...vx6w

1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w

Nay

# 2

It's unfortunate to vote nay on hard work that has been done, but I believe after the last proposal was rejected by the community, an effort should have been made to reconnect and form a new plan going foward. Ideally this would be done in concert with bounty curators, who are the direct users and beneficiaries of the software. A proposal with user support should be approved as the software is ultimately needed..

13ED...KQbF

13EDmaUe89xXocPppFmuoAZaCsckaJy3deAyVyiykk1zKQbF

Aye

# 1

The website needs a lot of work, but they are the only ones who have created a UI for this.

1xzc...1bX6

1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6

Nay

# 2

We agree with the comments made by W1ZSPR3.

Votes·8

Discussions·0