So I like the website but have some comments and suggestions for improvements: 1) I'd like to see a list view instead of grids to make better use of the space 2) A separate list of curators and bounties they're serving on would be great, which would show if there are curators serving on multiple bounties 3) Links to bounty pages and documents 4) sort and filter functionalities to make navigating the bounties easier. I'm sure others will have suggestions as well, it's an OK website with lots of potential at this moment imo.

I think it is something interesting to improve the transparency and understanding of Polkadot bounties. I agree with what Ionian said, especially point two, in order to better understand the curators that are active in Polkadot..

I like more tools about bounty and governance, but their UI looks still very rough.

Good work, need some UX work on the solution.

Most probably a proposal for the Polkadot’s DeFi Infrastructure & Tooling Bounty.

It's unfortunate to vote nay on hard work that has been done, but I believe after the last proposal was rejected by the community, an effort should have been made to reconnect and form a new plan going foward. Ideally this would be done in concert with bounty curators, who are the direct users and beneficiaries of the software. A proposal with user support should be approved as the software is ultimately needed..

The website needs a lot of work, but they are the only ones who have created a UI for this.

We agree with the comments made by W1ZSPR3.

I'm voting after the call we made with Vasilis. I think this project should be funded, but I agree with William that some effort should have been made towards the alignment with curators. And as I mentioned on the call, a more comprehensive long-term roadmap is required. I'm still in support of the proposal, and in case it fails, I hope that the team prepares another, more comprehensive proposal including detailed future plans and product vision.

Hi team, thanks for putting together Friday’s presentation. Although a bounty manager type of solution is needed, I’m leaning toward abstaining and wanted to share some feedback. I was expecting mockups or a preview of what is to come, as the current product isn’t usable yet without basic features like search, which I see as MVP essentials. As a community, we should probably ask for that clarity upfront. Right now, it’s hard to tell the plan from the product’s state. I also agreed with Kukabi’s point on the call about the big vision: bounty exploration for users. That’s the key for Polkadot builders! You seem curator-focused, which is fine but small-scale, and I’d love to hear how you’ll reach that broader goal without having to go through multiple phases/raises to get there. Maybe trim to a designer-developer duo to polish the MVP until curators use it regularly. If this ref doesn’t pass, consider tweaking it for next time.