We are happy to see that the team listened to the community and revised their budget. We think there could be further optimizations done down the road.

Personally, I do not feel so comfortable even voting in favor of this proposal, in spite of the changes they made. I think that everything that was done before is not corrected with this proposal. Personally I would like to see a major cleanup within this bounty..

We don not have conviction in either direction on this. The bounty's work is hard to spot.

We are pleased to see that the budget has been reduced and that the proposer has listened to the comments made. Now it seems reasonable to support this proposal.

I would like to see a return to roots with this bounty, the original Anti-scam bounty set up clear boundaries for payment and the aims of the bounty. It seems that since then the bounty may have become too ambitious and large for it's own good and can be trimmed down even further to return to its original vision. At the end of the day, I think having a team like this is a good idea but their methods and scope is wrong in my opinion, but for the benefit it's providing to the community I'll support it with the hopes that the curators and managers will take a hard, self-critical look at the bounty.

spending $360k to retrieve $160k. I have supported the Anti-scam team until now. I think is a great service they provide, but maybe they should scale it down even further, ROI at this point in time is not there, as the eco grows that can change.

Other members' worries make sense to me.

too expensive due to too many positions/hours allocated to this per month imo

The bounty has made a significant change to respond to community feedback, and should be open to continued feedback.

I support the proposal since it was revised in light of community feedback. Results should be observed before the next proposal.