[SS] DOT #1453 - Editorial Board in Spanish Cohort #2 Dec 2024

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1453

Editorial Board in Spanish Cohort #2

A proposal was made to fund the salaries of three members of the Spanish Editorial Board for six months.
The Marketing team could not agree on funding and suggested it be decided by the Polkadot community.
The Editorial Board has improved social media success and event impact in Latin America.
There were significant increases in followers and engagement compared to the previous year.
They request $46,000 to continue their work, including events and community engagement.
New signatories were added to support this proposal.

15fT...yBzL

15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL

Nay

# 2

I really don't understand why proposals such as this one get forwarded to OpenGov by the Marketing Bounty. If it failed to receive funding from the bounty, then it simply shouldn't be funded. If the proposer things that the bounty has been unfair, then they should make their complaint public with a detailed reasoning. Nay.

1xzc...1bX6

1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6

Nay

# 2

This proposal got rejected by the marketing bounty.

14Gn...YLEh

14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh

Nay

# 2

Many people within the Hispanic community are not satisfied with the work that has been done by this team. The fact that the marketing bounty has rejected this proposal also makes me inclined to vote no..

12Hi...E9N3

12His7t3EJ38tjdBbivUzWQeaNCLKfMqtKp1Ed3xHMyCE9N3

Nay

# 2

I personally don't believe Polkadot needs multilanguage marketing/social media presence at this stage and even though the idea of everyone speaking English as a lingua franca carries a lot of implications, I think having language/ethnic specific social media and marketing teams is both against the mythos of blockchain/web3 communities on a fundamental level but also not worth the effort on a practical level.

167Y...TY9F

167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F

Nay

# 2

Just translating past tweets is just not good enough for the amount of $ we are paying. The focus should be given to Creating a funnel on which we can feed the PBA, PBA-X, bringing new leaders to other countries, Spinning up meetups. They missed their opportunity to make it, they do not get a second chance, their stats have also been baked and are not showing the true numbers. their content is also targeted to people already in the ecosystem, showing how bad they did miss their true target. They do need a Leader with a clear vision of how to handle LATAM.

14gM...deVb

14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb

Nay

# 2

Personally I'm not against proposers come to OpenGov after rejection by a bounty. But I'm not sure the impact of this marketing proposal, and I prefer the treasury to reduce the spends on marketing.

12s6...nE8h

12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h

Nay

# 2

I agree with Ezio, nay here.

1ZSP...vx6w

1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w

Abstain

# 3

I think it's ok for proposals to be forwarded to OpenGov. I would like to see the Marketing Bount comment on the reasons and their evaluation.

1433...pWXn

14333MZvbGkcq5CZ8fYHZiFYwHNDaW3uiErDKMb7oqnupWXn

Nay

# 2

i see no value that would help the market cap

Votes·9

Discussions·0