@HELIKON, thank you for the feedback.
I could agree on the time-limited factor, but at the same time this is a delicate role. If a director is doing an excellent and transparent job, it wouldn’t really make sense to remove them just because a term has expired. I would personally prefer that the community retains the ability to remove a director at any time. This way, even without a strict term limit, directors would be aware that if they fail to respect the code of conduct or their commitment to the community, they could still be removed at any moment.
Also, let’s not forget that the PCF itself has an annual duration and needs to be renewed each time. For this reason, we could ask the PCF to include specific rules in the next proposal to complement and refine this WFC, after a trial period that would last until July 2026 (unless removals occur earlier).
For this reason, and considering that it has already been over a year without the two community-side directors, I would ask to support this initiative also on an experimental basis, so that we can better understand the actual effort and work behind this role.
