[BT] DOT #1561 - Referendum: Community Building Fund for Bend-PVM - Attracting Developer Contributors to the PolkaVM Ecosystem (500 DOT)
active
Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1561

A referendum has been proposed to allocate 500 DOT from the treasury to establish a Community Building Fund for Bend-PVM, a smart contract language optimized for PolkaVM. The goal is to expand the contributor base and foster an active developer ecosystem. The funds will be used for contributor rewards, hackathons, coding challenges, bug bounties, educational resources, and workshops. The allocation is as follows: 60% for direct contributor rewards, 20% for community hackathons and challenges, 15% for educational content and workshops, and 5% for administration and fund management. The community-driven approach aims to distribute knowledge, accelerate innovation, grow the ecosystem, and ensure sustainable development. Expected outcomes include increasing active contributors, hosting educational workshops, completing hackathons, and establishing a transparent contribution tracking system. All fund distributions will be publicly recorded and verified through a multi-signature account, with monthly reports detailing expenditures and progress. This approach is expected to accelerate development, create a pipeline of skilled developers, strengthen Polkadot's position, and demonstrate the effectiveness of treasury funds in fostering innovation.

Cast your votesingle

Votes·8

1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSP...vx6w
1ZSPR3zNg5Po3obkhXTPR95DepNBzBZ3CyomHXGHK9Uvx6w
Aye
# 1
Interesting experimental project that is being developed in the open. Hopefully this modest amount can help get it off the ground. If anything gives pause, the social/community links on the website are broken, however the github exists.
1xzc...1bX6
1xzc...1bX6
1xzcLSwo7xBFkJYZiL4EHaqFpuPTkH641E3V43W4cuk1bX6
Nay
# 2
The proposed bounty is not compliant with the standards approved by 1254.
12s6...nE8h
12s6...nE8h
12s6UMSSfE2bNxtYrJc6eeuZ7UxQnRpUzaAh1gPQrGNFnE8h
Abstain
# 3
Not sure of benefits of this proposal, but we might reconsider our vote later on, now even the decision deposit wasn't placed.
167Y...TY9F
167Y...TY9F
167YoKNriVtP4Nxk9F9GRV7HTKu5VnxaRq1pKMANAnmmTY9F
Aye
# 1
I agree with this proposal and find the amount asked low for the deliverables, reporting of outcomes to advance this further through OpenGov will be expected.
14gM...deVb
14gM...deVb
14gMJV95zwxUsFEZDSC8mtBVifS6SypKJkfBKANkMsLZdeVb
Nay
# 2
I don't think they can make the deliveries with only 500 DOT, wrong calculation?
15fT...yBzL
15fT...yBzL
15fTH34bbKGMUjF1bLmTqxPYgpg481imThwhWcQfCyktyBzL
Nay
# 2
Bounty curators not listed in the proposal. Decision deposit not placed. Could have been an interesting proposal, but it's not looking good in its current state.
12Kt...DCoJ
12Kt...DCoJ
12KtA8mtfsK1CyQb4utLiwG3ao22z77w2cM2GqnaL2RiDCoJ
Nay
# 2
As SAX mentioned in their public comments, the proposed bounty is not compliant with the standards approved by 1254.
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn...YLEh
14Gn7SEmCgMX7Ukuppnw5TRjA7pao2HFpuJo39frB42tYLEh
Nay
# 2
I share the view of the rest of the team, I think it is not a bounty in line with what is proposed in Polkadot.

Discussions·0

No current comments
Information
Snapshot
Timestamp
Created
May 18 2025 04:43
Start date
May 18 2025 00:00
End date
Jun 17 2025 00:00
Results
Voters
8
one-person-one-vote
Aye
2 VOTE
 
Nay
5 VOTE
 
Abstain
1 VOTE
 
© 2025 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.