[SS] #1798 - Retroactive Treasury Proposal: Ideal Network
[SS] #1798 - Retroactive Treasury Proposal: Ideal Network
active
Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1798

Here is a summary of the Ideal Network treasury proposal:

  • Ideal Labs is asking for $38,760 for work they already did.
  • They worked extra hours to finish the Ideal Network randomness system.
  • They found two big problems during testing: the design didn’t work well, and there were security risks.
  • They fixed the problems by changing the design and making it safer.
  • They also added support for smart contracts and a payment system.
  • The team paid for the extra work themselves to finish on time.
  • All the work is done and can be checked on their GitHub page.
  • This is a one-time request for the extra hours they worked.
Cast your votesingle
Results
Voters
3
one-person-one-vote
Information
Members
5
Timestamp
Created
Nov 27 2025 19:59
Start date
Nov 27 2025 19:59
End date
Dec 27 2025 19:59

Votes·3

Anonymous
Nay
Nay

投票为Nay
这种问题导致的工时增加似乎并不应该由国库进行承担,并且目前的成果也似乎并不显著,希望提供更充分的证明

Anonymous
Nay
Nay

如果这是“前期调研不充分 → 设计错误 → 返工”,那应该是团队自己的工程风险,不应该向国库要钱。

工程项目常有未知复杂性,但这是团队必须承担的风险,不应该由国库为错误估算买单。否则国库就变成保险公司了,任何团队都可以预算不足 → 超支 → 要补偿 → 无上限。

因为国库支持的是最终“交付的开源成果”,而不是“开发过程中遇到的所有困难”。如果提案的成果是一个可用的 randomness layer、一个 parachain、一个工具链,那就不应该为你在开发这些成果路上遇到了问题而承担额外的费用。因为最初的提案目标是交付最终成果,而不是雇佣了团队来解决实际中遇到的所有问题,因为如果因为这些问题你不解决而导致目标没有被交付,那国库完全可以收回之前已经执行分配的金额。

Cumulus lookahead collator 产生的不兼容,以及 XCM origin / fee 的一些复杂度等,这些都是公开文档与架构的一部分,不是隐性 bug,我认为是开发团队可以在调研阶段发现的。总之,如果是因为前期调研不足,导致的估算偏差,不应该由国库来承担。

Anonymous
Nay
Nay

投票为 Nay
有团队自身设计失误导致的超支,该成本不应由国库承担

Discussions·0

No current comment data
Information
Members
5
Timestamp
Created
Nov 27 2025 19:59
Start date
Nov 27 2025 19:59
End date
Dec 27 2025 19:59
Results
Voters
3
one-person-one-vote
© 2025 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.