[BS] #1541 - Polkadot Storage Phase 3
active
Description

https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/1541

Polkadot Storage has a new long-term plan to improve their storage system. They have completed 90% of phase 3 and are testing it in a private testnet. They will soon move to a public testnet and work on integrating it with the mainnet. Here are some of the new ideas they have for phase 4:

  1. Jam Integration: They want to use their storage for Jam DA resupply and let any Jam Service use their long-term storage.
  2. Light weight proof system: They want to offer a cheaper and lighter proof system for users who don't need strong guarantees.
  3. Replication: They are working on moving from full replication to something like Erasure coding for better efficiency.
  4. Legal: They are exploring responsibilities and liabilities when dealing with toxic data.
  5. Economic model: They are researching the best numbers for slashing, storage costs, retrieval costs, and pricing to be competitive with centralized solutions. They also want to allow the use of restaked DOT.
  6. XCM: They want to expose the storage so that other parachains can store data.
  7. Marketplace model: They are thinking of the storage layer as a marketplace that gives access to all forms of competing centralized and decentralized storage.

Overall, they want to turn this into a proper storage product and build applications on top of it. They are excited about the potential and attention on storage lately.

Cast your votesingle

Votes·4

14pa...oata
14pa...oata
14pa3BAYZLPvZfRDjWEfZXZWBVU45E67HUQEUxNCrdXGoata
Aye
# 1
缺点: 提案结构过于松散,缺乏整理 优点: 1. 明确的目标以及韧性,即使没有通过也能够坚持开发 2. 足够明确且合理的产品目标,能够弥补生态空缺 期望: 薪资过高,期望能够减少成本,或者增加收入
12mP...Eyoh
12mP...Eyoh
12mP4sjCfKbDyMRAEyLpkeHeoYtS5USY4x34n9NMwQrcEyoh
Nay
# 2
PolkaWorld 对该提案投出反对票(NAY)。 我们先不讨论存储是否是当前 Polkadot 生态的刚需,以及该提案是否与 Crust、Filecoin 等现有解决方案存在重复、是否存在“重复造轮子”的问题,我们认为团队在本提案中提出的薪资水平过高! Polkadot 国库作为一个公共资助者,不应被动接受任何一口价的报价。对于预算的合理性,社区应有讨论与监督的权利。 尽管我们承认该提案在技术上具有相当复杂度与深度,但我们特别关注其成本结构——尤其是 每人每月 $25,000 的 FTE 单价,这意味着团队成员的年薪高达 $300,000 美元。 这个数字远高于当前 Web3 行业内的普遍薪资水平,即便在一些高成本国家也是如此。根据 Web3.Career(https://web3.career/web3-salaries) 的最新数据: • 🇳🇴 挪威:约 $85,000 / 年 • 🇸🇪 瑞典:约 $75,000–80,000 / 年 • 🇺🇸 美国(最高):约 $130,000–140,000 / 年 而该团队位于 芬兰,其本地薪资水平通常与瑞典、挪威持平甚至更低,在此背景下提出如此高的报价,明显偏离合理水平。 更重要的是,团队中所有成员的薪资,已接近甚至超过了 Web3 行业内 CTO 的平均水平,却并未体现出必要的岗位区分或绩效依据。 我们认为,对于由国库资助的公共产品项目而言,不仅需要在技术上追求卓越,也必须在成本上追求透明与高效。我们恳请团队能够重新评估当前的薪资设置,并尽可能参考所在地区的行业基准,做出更加合理的调整,以保障生态发展的可持续性。
16ap...141C
16ap...141C
16ap6fdqS2rqFsyYah35hX1FH6rPNWtLqqXZDQC9x6GW141C
Nay
# 2
投票:反对 1. 需要把这次的金额也拆分成不高于 $500k 的 milestone,之前交付的两个 milestone 提案都为 $450k 左右 2. storage 之前 crust, filecoin 都有做,但是现实情况是生态项目目前对于 storage 的需求还不够高,在这个情况下不应重复造轮子,或者拉长时间降低成本 3. 跟 Equilibrium 开发团队有重叠,而且看着有点类似一个专业的 outsource 团队,对产品是否能够落地存疑
167r...714h
167r...714h
167rjWHghVwBJ52mz8sNkqr5bKu5vpchbc9CBoieBhVX714h
Aye
# 1

Discussions·0

No current comments
Information
Snapshot
Timestamp
Created
May 12 2025 05:30
Start date
May 12 2025 05:30
End date
Jun 11 2025 05:30
Results
Voters
4
one-person-one-vote
Aye
2 VOTE
 
Nay
2 VOTE
 
Abstain
0 VOTE
 
© 2025 OpenSquare. All Rights Reserved.