This proposal, if passed, will approve the CP103: Launch an RWA Lending Market

Proposal to create an RWA-focused lending market to give users the ability to lend and borrow against eligible pool tokens.

- Link to the proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP103/CP103.md
- Link to the RFC on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/cp103-launch-an-rwa-lending-market/6346

Do you agree with this proposal?
Please vote **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.


CP103: Launch an RWA Lending Market

This proposal, if passed, will approve our migration to OpenGov with the suggested tracks and parameters. Some changes will also be made to our governance process as a result of an accepted migration. 

- Link to the proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP108/CP108.md
- Link to the RFC on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-centrifuge-migration-to-opengov/5984

Do you agree with this proposal?

Please vote **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.

CP108: Centrifuge Migration to OpenGov


This proposal, if passed, will approve the CP105: Data Protocol (Technical Proposal) 
Proposal to introduce the Data Protocol, a further development of the Private Offchain Data (POD) within the Centrifuge network, enabling secure data storage, collaboration, and sharing functionalities.

- Link to the proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP105/CP105.md
- Link to the RFC on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/cp105-data-protocol-technical-proposal/6344

Do you agree with this proposal?
Please vote **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.

CP105: Data Protocol (Technical Proposal) 

This proposal, if passed, will approve the CP104: Financial Reporting.
Proposal to build standardised real-time financial reporting for Centrifuge pools based on the data made available in the subquery.

- Link to the proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP104.md
- Link to the RFC on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/cp104-financial-reporting/6351

Do you agree with this proposal?
Please vote **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.

CP104: Financial Reporting

This proposal, if passed, will approve the agreements for how to manage the funds in the Centrifuge Treasury. This is an update to the existing agreement that passed with CP58.

- Link to the proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP107.md
- Link to the RFC on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-updated-treasury-spending-agreement/6290/1

Do you agree with this proposal?

Please vote **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.

CP107: Updated Treasury Spending Agreement

This OpenSquare snapshot is to get a **temperature check** of what the sentiment is around the Treasury Proposal from Tangem Wallet to integrate Centrifuge and Altair into their wallet.

The initial proposal mentions 500 branded wallets (2-card set) + integration of CFG/AIR + delivery for a total cost of $16,470. Based on the input in the forum post and [Governance Call 26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvRNtiwHSFY) from the DAO, more options are provided (including the total cost).

Read the full proposal and discussion [here](https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-integration-of-the-network-into-tangem-and-production-of-500-branded-centrifuge-wallets-2-card-sets/6332).

Option 2 includes customised boxes instead of branded wallets.

Note, that **this vote does not determine the outcome** of this proposal - an onchain proposal is still required in order for it to pass.

Please vote on **one** of the three options below.

Proposal to integrate CFG + AIR into Tangem

This proposal, if passed, will approve the Roadmap Proposal 1  proposed by PEG.

- Link to the proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP87.md
- Link to the RFC on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/cp87-roadmap-proposal-1/6077

Do you agree with this proposal?
Please vote **Yes**,  **No** or **Abstain**.

CP87: Roadmap Proposal 1

This proposal, if passed, will give a mandate to the OpenGov Technical Committee.

The initial members will be seeded in the same runtime upgrade that implements OpenGov on both Centrifuge and Altair, respectively.

Link to the proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP86.md

Link to the RFC on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-opengov-technical-committee-mandate-request/6085

Do you agree with this proposal?
Please vote **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.

CP86: OpenGov Technical Committee Mandate Request

This proposal, if passed, will introduce and add different pool fees for different types of pools.

- Link to the proposal on Github: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP83.md
- Link to RFC on Gov forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/cp83-updating-cp28-centrifuge-protocol-fees/6022

Do you agree with this proposal?
Please vote **Yes**, **No **or **Abstain**.

CP83: Updating CP28 Centrifuge Protocol Fees

If passed, this proposal will discontinue Centrifuge Crowdloan rewards claiming 60 days after the date this proposal passes (if passed).

- Link to the proposal on Github: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP84.md
- Link to RFC on Gov forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/cp84-unclaimed-polkadot-rewards/6035

Do you agree with this proposal?

CP84: Unclaimed Polkadot Rewards

If passed, this proposal will discontinue rewards claiming on Tinlake 30 days after the date this proposal passes (if passed) and transfer any remaining tokens from the Tinlake wallet to the Centrifuge DAO Treasury wallet.

Link to the proposal on Github: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP81.md
Link to RFC on Gov forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-unclaimed-tinlake-rewards/5885

- Do you agree with this proposal?

Please vote **Yes**, **No **or **Abstain**.

CP81: Unclaimed Tinlake Rewards

This proposal, if passed, would introduces an additional component to the transaction fee that will be transferred to the treasury for each transaction in addition to the standard weight-based fee system that is part of any Substrate based chain.

Link to proposal on github: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP74.md
Link to RFC on Gov forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-updating-transaction-fees-for-pools/5773/

- Do you agree with this proposal?

Please vote **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.

CP74: Updating Transaction Fees for Pools

This proposal, if passed, would amend the current POP V2 process to the new POP v3 process which would simplify the Pool Onboarding Process (POP) by making it more similar to other Centrifuge Governance processes, which use the formula of Request for Comment (RFC) followed by discussion (during this discussion period the Centrifuge Credit Group can choose to put forward an assessment) and then a vote. It would also make it a faster, simpler, and clearer process.

- Link to proposal on github: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP68/CP68.md
- Link to RFC on Gov forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-update-the-pool-onboarding-proposal-for-open-pools-pop-version-3/5698

Do you agree with this proposal?
Please vote Yes, No or Abstain.

CP68: Update the Pool Onboarding Proposal for Open Pools (POP) – Version 3

This proposal, if passed, will introduce three different types of pools on Centrifuge and define them:

- Open Pools
- Closed Pools
- Portfolio Pools

**Do you agree with this proposal?**

Please vote **Yes**, **No** or **Abstain**.

See the full proposal on GitHub: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP63.md
See the discussion in the RFC: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-definitions-of-pool-types-categories/5688

CP63: Definitions of Pool Types & Categories

This proposal will
- extend the versatility of the Centrifuge protocol

Linked Pools are an extension of functionality for on-chain pools beyond the existing asset-financing logic. This feature will allow so-called “linked” pools to be funded directly by another pool where the system was previously limited to fund only assets.

**Do you agree with this proposal?**

Please vote **Yes** or **No**.

See the full proposal: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP59.md
See the discussion in the RFC: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-linked-pools-technical-proposal/5569

CP59: Linked Pools

The objective of this proposal is to make the following agreements as a DAO:

- We agree to be diligent and conservative in spending of CFG from the on-chain Treasury.
- We agree to try to learn from the mistakes of other DAOs before us so that Centrifuge may spend its Treasury funds more wisely, and thereby give it a greater chance at succeeding in its mission.
- We agree to not start a broader grants program at the current time.
- We agree to raise the minimum quorum requirement to 66% of the council voting yes in order for treasury spending proposals to be passed.
  - This is an increase from the currently implemented 55% minimum quorum and should be added to the language in [CP2](https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP2/CP2.md).
  - This will need to be reassessed upon a possible move to Open Gov.

These agreements apply to all Centrifuge community members and those making proposals to the DAO treasury.

**Do you agree with this proposal?**

Please vote **Yes** or **No**.

See the full proposal: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP58.md
See the discussion in the RFC: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-treasury-spending-agreement/5575



CP58: Treasury Spending Agreement

This proposal, if passed, will approve:

- **Changes to our CP Framework and Governance Process**

Do you agree with this proposal?

Please vote **Yes** or **No**.

**Proposal on GitHub:** https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP52.md
RFC on the forum: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-changes-to-our-cp-framework-and-governance-process/5448

CP52 (GI): Changes to our CP Framework and Governance Process

If this OpenSquare snapshot passes, it will move this proposal forward to an on-chain proposal to:


- List CFG in the Omnipool on HydraDX
- Mint 500,000 CFG into the HydraDX Omnipool account 7L53bUTBbfuj14UpdCNPwmgzzHSsrsTWBHX5pys32mVWM3C1

Do you agree with this proposal?

Please vote **<ins>Yes</ins>** or **<ins>No</ins>**.

See the full proposal: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP53.md
See the discussion in the RFC: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-listing-cfg-in-hydradx-omnipool-seeding-initial-liquidity/5412

CP53(GI): Listing CFG in HydraDX Omnipool & seeding initial liquidity 

- List CFG on Stellaswap
-  Mint 13847 CFG as incentive rewards into the wallet 4g14AyHrg4MrFubtUhq6omPsN6zmtfuMHD5Hg9NUzGj97Bdd


Do you agree with this proposal?

Please vote <ins>Yes</ins> or <ins>No</ins>.

See the full proposal: https://github.com/centrifuge/cps/blob/main/cps/CP48.md
See the discussion in the RFC: https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-cfg-liquidity-incentives-on-stellaswap-on-moonbeam/5356

CP48(GI): CFG listing and Liquidity Incentives on Stellaswap on Moonbeam

Original Forum Post - https://gov.centrifuge.io/t/rfc-cfg-liquidity-incentives-on-stellaswap-on-moonbeam/5356





```
Proposal type: CP4
Author(s): ogre44444
Beneficiary: Stellaswap
Wallet: 0x4300e09284e3bB4d9044DdAB31EfAF5f3301DABa (Moonbeam)
Date proposed: 2023-04-24
```
```
```
# Summary

This is a proposal for CFG tokens to be used as incentives on StellaSwap’s CFG-DOT pool and for Stellaswap to support the growth of CFG on Moonbeam.. If accepted this would run for 2 months, at which point both parties can evaluate the success of the program and take next steps.

# Background on Stellaswap

Stellaswap is the leading dex on Moonbeam, generally capturing 80-90% of on-chain volume. We’ve recently launched Pulsar, a Uniswap v3-style concentrated liquidity dex which constitutes a unique offering on Polkadot. The capital efficiency of Pulsar is many times higher than a standard dex, allowing much larger trades to be made on the same TVL without compromising on slippage. https://app.stellaswap.com/exchange/swap


# The Advantages of CFG liquidity on Pulsar

There are two angles to explore in terms of how Pulsar incentives are uniquely positioned to promote the growth of CFG.

### Stellaswap Support & Alignment with Centrifuge

Stellaswap is the leading dex on Moonbeam, making it readily accessible to Metamask users coming from other EVM chains. We want to help create awareness for Centrifuge’s Real World Assets, and we have a couple of ways to help create exposure.

* When a user selects CFG on the Swap page, put a message with a link under the swap widget, “Learn more about how Centrifuge is bringing Real World Assets to DeFi”
* A link to Centrifuge would appear on CFG’s row on our Pools page. Users browsing our liquidity pools would see this and be able to click it to learn more. So much of DeFi is just about awareness and discovery, and every user counts.

Another way we can support Centrifuge is with our Cross Chain Swap feature. Tinlake is on Ethereum and funds its loans with Dai, making it awkward for users on Polkadot to get involved. But on Stellaswap, users can swap from any Polkadot asset into Dai on Ethereum in one click.

### Pulsar
Pulsar is an extremely efficient Concentrated Liquidity AMM. With a utilization rate between 20-100%, liquidity goes much farther on Pulsar than in a traditional "v2" style dex, enabling much lower slippage and sustainable yields.

The second reason Pulsar is an excellent choice is efficiency. As aforementioned, concentrated liquidity can do a lot more than standard constant product pools. Whereas a Uniswap v2 style dex will only use ~5% of tokens in a day, we’ve seen some of our pools approach 100% on volatile days. This means that your incentives go farther on Pulsar in terms of reducing slippage on trades.

And that’s a key thing to consider. Slippage governs whether an asset is suitable for lending protocols. Slippage also governs how much money can enter a token at a time. Lower slippage leads to greater adoption.

Real Life Example of Slippage Reduction with Lower TVL
|Pair|Type|TVL|Price Impact of $5k Trade|
|----|----|----|----|
|USDC-GLMR|Standard AMM|$2M|.52%|
|USDT-DOT|Pulsar|$176k|.49%|

With a TVL of 12x, USDC-GLMR still has higher slippage than the USDT-DOT Pulsar pair.

This proposal also asks that Centrifuge provide CFG-DOT incentives on Pulsar. Because of Pulsar’s efficiency, swaps can be supported with a more modest allocation than a constant product pool would require. Centrifuge incentives would be accompanied by STELLA incentives.

In conclusion, we think this is an excellent opportunity to grow not just liquidity for the CFG token, but also awareness for Real World Assets.

### Budgeting and Incentive Structure

|Asset|Price|Reward Value|Amount|Period|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|CFG|.288|$4,000|13847|8 Weeks|
|STELLA|.067|$2500|37313|8 weeks|

|Pool|Target TVL|Expected APR|$ CFG / Day|$ Stella / Day|Reward APR|Swap APR|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|CFG-DOT|150k|67%|$71|$45|27.8%|40%|

# Responsible To Implement
Governance and Coordination Group (ImdioR, Rhano). This proposal will utilize CP4, per community guidance.

# Delivery & Reporting
Stellaswap would be ready to launch this pool upon delivery of the tokens, or whenever the Centrifuge team finds it convenient based on their marketing schedule. Funds would be delivered to the Stellaswap multisig, from which they'll be moved to the farm's rewarder contract. Stellaswap would be responsible for reporting statistics such as TVL growth and swap volume to determine the pool's traction.

